How do geometry-related parameters influence the clinical performance of orthodontic mini-implants? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Issue 12 (December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cunha, A.C.; da Veiga, A.M.A.; Masterson, D.; Mattos, C.T.; Nojima, L.I.; Nojima, M.C.G.; Maia, L.C.
• Is Part Of: International journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. Volume 46:Issue 12(2017:Dec.)
• Page Start: 1539
• Page End: 1551
• Publication Date: 2017-12
• Subjects: orthodontic anchorage procedures -- surface properties -- treatment outcome -- systematic review -- meta-analysis; Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry, Operative; Oral Surgical Procedures; Surgery, Oral; Dentistry; Maxilla -- Surgery; Mouth -- Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.52059
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2017.06.010
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0901-5027

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate how parameters related to geometry influence the clinical performance of orthodontic mini-implants (MIs). Systematic searches were performed in electronic databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library, and Cochrane Library and reference lists up to March 2016. Eligibility criteria comprised clinical studies involving patients who received MIs for orthodontic anchorage, with data for categories of MI dimension, shape, and thread design and insertion site, and evaluated by assessment of primary and secondary stability. Study selection, data extraction, quality assessment, and a meta-analysis were carried out. Twenty-seven studies were included in the qualitative synthesis: five randomized, eight prospective, and 14 retrospective clinical studies. One study with a serious risk of bias was later excluded. Medium and short MIs (1.4–1.9 mm diameter and 5–8 mm length) presented the highest success rates (0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.92). A maximum insertion torque of 13.28 N cm (standard error 0.34) was observed for tapered self-drilling MIs in the mandible, whereas cylindrical MIs in the maxilla presented a maximum removal torque of 10.01 N cm (standard error 0.17). Moderate evidence indicates that the clinical performance of MIs is influenced by implant geometry parameters and is also related to properties of the insertion site. However, further research is necessary to support these associations.