Quantitative microleakage analysis of endodontic temporary filling materials using a glucose penetration model. (April 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Sin-Young; Ahn, Jin-Soo; Yi, Young-Ah; Lee, Yoon; Hwang, Ji-Yun; Seo, Deog-Gyu
• Is Part Of: Acta odontologica Scandinavica. Volume 73:Number 2(2015)
• Page Start: 137
• Page End: 143
• Publication Date: 2014-04
• Subjects: Caviton -- glucose -- IRM -- microleakage -- temporary filling materials; Dentistry -- Periodicals; 617.6005
• DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2014.961028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0001-6357

Abstract

Abstract: Objective. The purpose of this study was to analyze the sealing ability of different temporary endodontic materials over a 6-week period using a glucose penetration model. Materials and methods. Standardized holes were formed on 48 dentin discs from human premolars. The thicknesses of the specimens were distributed evenly to 2 mm, 3 mm and 4 mm. Prepared dentin specimens were randomly assigned into six groups ( n = 7) and the holes in the dentin specimens were filled with two kinds of temporary filling materials as per the manufacturers' instructions as follows: Caviton (GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm and IRM (Dentsply International Inc., Milford, DE) 2 mm, 3 mm, 4 mm. The remaining specimens were used as positive and negative controls and all specimens underwent thermocycling (1000; 5–55°C). The sealing ability of all samples was evaluated using the leakage model for glucose. The samples were analyzed by a spectrophotometer in quantitative glucose microleakage test over a period of 6 weeks. As a statistical inference, a mixed effect analysis was applied to analyze serial measurements over time. Results. The Caviton groups showed less glucose penetration in comparison with the IRM groups. The Caviton 4 mm group demonstrated relatively low glucose leakage over the test period. High glucose leakage was detected throughout the test period in all IRM groups. The glucose leakage level increased after 1 week in the Caviton 2 mm group and after 4 weeks in the Caviton 3 mm and 4 mm groups ( p < 0.05). Conclusions. Caviton had better sealing ability than IRM in the glucose penetration model during 6 weeks. Temporary filling of Caviton to at least 3 mm in thickness is necessary and temporary filling periods should not exceed 4 weeks.