Analysis of Mars Exploration Rover wheel mobility processes and the limitations of classical terramechanics models using discrete element method simulations. (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Johnson, Jerome B.; Duvoy, Paul X.; Kulchitsky, Anton V.; Creager, Colin; Moore, Jeffery
• Is Part Of: Journal of terramechanics. Volume 73(2017:Oct.)
• Page Start: 61
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: Mars Exploration Rovers -- Discrete element method -- Model validation -- High wheel slip mobility -- Wheel mobility testing -- Terramechanics -- ARTEMIS; Trafficability -- Periodicals; Praticabilité (Routes) -- Périodiques; Trafficability; Periodicals; 629.222
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2017.09.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-4898

Abstract

Highlights: Physical processes of Mars Exploration Rover (MER) wheel mobility are described. Tailings piles build behind a MER wheel during high wheel slip conditions. ARTEMIS mobility model terramechanics equations don't account for tailings piles. MER discrete element method (DEM) model accurately predict tailings pile formation. A wheel mobility lookup table from DEM simulations will improve ARTEMIS accuracy. Abstract: A previous three-dimensional discrete element method (DEM) model of Mars Exploration Rovers (MERs) wheel mobility demonstrated agreement with test data for wheel drawbar pull and sinkage for wheel slips from 0.0 to 0.7. Here, results from the previous model are compared with wheel mobility data for non-MER wheels that cover the range of wheel slip from 0.0 to 1.0. Wheel slips near 1.0 are of interest for assessing rover mobility hazards. DEM MER wheel model predictions show close agreement with weight-normalized wheel drawbar pull data from 0.0 to 0.99 wheel slip and show a similar trend for wheel sinkage. The nonlinear increase in MER wheel drawbar pull and sinkage for wheel slips greater that 0.7 is caused by development of a tailings pile behind the wheel as it digs into the regolith. Classical terramechanics wheel mobility equations used in the ARTEMIS MER mobility model are inaccurate above wheel slips of 0.6 as they do not account for the regolith tailings pile behind the wheel. To improve ARTEMIS accuracy at wheel slips greater that 0.6 a lookup table of drawbar pull, wheel torque, and sinkage derived from DEM mobility simulations can be substituted for terramechanics equation calculations.