Characterization of atmospheric black carbon and co-pollutants in urban and rural areas of Spain. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Becerril-Valle, M.; Coz, E.; Prévôt, A.S.H.; Močnik, G.; Pandis, S.N.; Sánchez de la Campa, A.M.; Alastuey, A.; Díaz, E.; Pérez, R.M.; Artíñano, B.
• Is Part Of: Atmospheric environment. Volume 169(2017)
• Page Start: 36
• Page End: 53
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Carbonaceous aerosols -- Black carbon -- Absorption Ångström exponent -- Source apportionment -- Fossil fuel -- Biomass burning; Air -- Pollution -- Periodicals; Air -- Pollution -- Meteorological aspects -- Periodicals; 551.51
• DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.09.014
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1352-2310

Abstract

Abstract: A one-year black carbon (BC) experimental study was performed at three different locations (urban traffic, urban background, rural) in Spain with different equivalent BC (eBC) source characteristics by means of multi-wavelength Aethalometers. The Aethalometer model was used for the source apportionment study, based on the difference in absorption spectral dependence of emissions from biomass burning (bb) and fossil fuel (ff) combustion. Most studies use a single bb and ff absorption Ångström exponent (AAE) pair (AAEbb and AAEff ), however in this work we use a range of AAE values associated with fossil fuel and biomass burning based on the available measurements, which represents more properly all conditions. A sensitivity analysis of the source specific AAE was carried out to determine the most appropriate AAE values, being site dependent and seasonally variable. Here we present a methodology for the determination of the ranges of AAEbb and AAEff by evaluating the correlations between the source apportionment of eBC using the Aethalometer model with four biomass burning tracers measured at the rural site. The best combination was AAEbb = [1.63–1.74] and AAEff = [0.97–1.12]. Mean eBC values (±SD) obtained during the period of study were 3.70 ± 3.73 μg m −3 at the traffic urban site, 2.33 ± 2.96 μg m −3 at the urban background location, and 2.61 ± 5.04 μg m −3 in the rural area. High contributions of eBC to the PM10 mass were found (values up to 21% in winter), but with high eBC/PM10 variability. The hourly mean eBCff and eBCbb concentrations varied from 0 to 51 μg m −3 and from 0 to 50 μg m −3 at the three sites, respectively, exhibiting distinct seasonal and daily patterns. The fossil fuel combustion was the dominant eBC source at the urban sites, while biomass burning dominated during the cold season (88% of eBCbb ) in the rural area. Daily PM2.5 and PM10 samples were collected using high-volume air samplers and analyzed for OC and EC. Analysis of biomass burning tracers and organic (OC) and elemental (EC) carbon in the rural area indicate that biomass combustion is the main source, while OC and EC indicate a lower influence of this source at the urban site. Highlights: One-year black carbon (BC) experimental study at three different locations in Spain. Estimation of fossil fuel and biomass burning absorption Ångström exponents. Source apportionment of black carbon from fossil fuel and biomass burning. Dominance of fossil fuel at urban sites and biomass burning in winter at rural area. Relationship between BC with biomass burning tracers, organic and elemental carbon.