Primary Wound Closure After Open Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study Examining Nonunion and Deep Infection. Issue 3 (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Primary Wound Closure After Open Fracture: A Prospective Cohort Study Examining Nonunion and Deep Infection. Issue 3 (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Primary Wound Closure After Open Fracture
- Authors:
- Scharfenberger, Angela V.
Alabassi, Khaled
Smith, Stephanie
Weber, Donald
Dulai, Sukhdeep K.
Bergman, Joseph W.
Beaupre, Lauren A. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objectives: Determine the proportion of subjects developing deep infection or nonunion after primary wound closure of open fractures (humerus, radius/ulna, femur, and tibia/fibula). Secondarily, a matched-series analysis compared outcomes with subjects who underwent delayed wound closure. Design: Prospective cohort between 2009 and 2013 of subjects undergoing primary closure. Setting: Trauma center. Participants: Eighty-three (84 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Eighty-two (99%) subjects (83 fractures) provided follow-up data. Matching (age, sec, fracture location, and grade) was performed using study data of delayed wound closure undertaken at the same center between 2001 and 2009 (n = 68 matched subjects). Intervention: Primary wound closure occurred when the fracture grade was Gustilo grade 3A or lower and the wound deemed clean at initial surgery. Standardized evaluations occurred until the fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were also undertaken at 1 year. Main Outcome Measurements: Deep infection is defined as infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy after wound closure; nonunion is defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing 1-year after fracture. Results: Three (4%) subjects had deep infections, whereas 10 (12%) subjects developed nonunion in the primary closure cohort. In the matched analyses [n = 68 pairs; (136 subjects)],Abstract : Objectives: Determine the proportion of subjects developing deep infection or nonunion after primary wound closure of open fractures (humerus, radius/ulna, femur, and tibia/fibula). Secondarily, a matched-series analysis compared outcomes with subjects who underwent delayed wound closure. Design: Prospective cohort between 2009 and 2013 of subjects undergoing primary closure. Setting: Trauma center. Participants: Eighty-three (84 fractures) subjects were enrolled. Eighty-two (99%) subjects (83 fractures) provided follow-up data. Matching (age, sec, fracture location, and grade) was performed using study data of delayed wound closure undertaken at the same center between 2001 and 2009 (n = 68 matched subjects). Intervention: Primary wound closure occurred when the fracture grade was Gustilo grade 3A or lower and the wound deemed clean at initial surgery. Standardized evaluations occurred until the fracture(s) healed; phone interviews and chart reviews were also undertaken at 1 year. Main Outcome Measurements: Deep infection is defined as infection requiring unplanned surgical debridement and/or sustained antibiotic therapy after wound closure; nonunion is defined as unplanned surgical intervention after definitive wound closure or incomplete radiographic healing 1-year after fracture. Results: Three (4%) subjects had deep infections, whereas 10 (12%) subjects developed nonunion in the primary closure cohort. In the matched analyses [n = 68 pairs; (136 subjects)], the primary closure cohort had fewer deep infections [n = 3 (4%) vs. n = 6 (9%)] and nonunions [n = 9 (13%) vs. n = 19 (29%)] than the delayed closure cohort ( P < 0.001). Conclusions: Primary wound closure after an open fracture appears acceptable in appropriately selected patients and may reduce the risk of deep infection and nonunion compared with delayed closure; a definitive randomized trial is needed. Level of Evidence: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma. Volume 31:Issue 3(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of orthopaedic trauma
- Issue:
- Volume 31:Issue 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 31, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0031-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- open fracture -- wound management -- deep infection -- nonunion
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals
Orthopedics -- Periodicals
Wounds and Injuries -- therapy -- Periodicals
Periodicals
617.47044 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jorthotrauma/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jorthotrauma.com ↗
http://cufts2.lib.sfu.ca/CJDB/BVAS/journal/149202 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00005131-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000751 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0890-5339
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5027.675000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 5021.xml