Distinguishing Erosive Lichen Planus From Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Issue 2 (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Day, Tania; Bowden, Nikola; Jaaback, Ken; Otton, Geoff; Scurry, James
• Is Part Of: Journal of lower genital tract disease. Volume 20:Issue 2(2016:Apr.)
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: differentiated VIN -- erosive lichen planus -- atypia -- regeneration -- copy variant analysis; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cervix uteri -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Generative organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; 618.1
• DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000179
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1089-2591

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: Erosive lichen planus (LP) and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN) may display overlapping histopathologic features. Materials and Methods: We searched the local pathology database for vulvar biopsies reported as dVIN or erosive vulvitis during 2011 to 2013 inclusive. After review of patient notes and slides, there were 5 cases with a clinical appearance and course consistent with erosive LP and histopathology showing epithelial regeneration. We then selected 5 cases of dVIN in which the clinical course and histopathology supported the diagnosis. We performed immunohistochemistry for p16 and p53 on all cases and did copy variant analysis on 1 case each of erosive LP and dVIN. Results: Histopathology of the LP cases showed epithelial thinning, absent stratum corneum, lack of maturation, as well as nuclear changes of enlargement, pleomorphism, and hyperchromasia. Three LP cases (60%) showed a wild-type p53 pattern and 2 (40%) were confluent positive. Two dVIN cases (40%) showed full-thickness loss of differentiation. One case (20%) of dVIN was p53 negative, 2 (40%) were wild-type, 1 was confluent positive, and 1 showed dark suprabasilar staining. All cases were negative for p16. Compared with control, erosive LP epithelium showed a similar copy-number pattern, whereas the dVIN epithelium had many copy-number changes. Conclusions: A small subset of clinically diagnosed vulvovaginal erosive LP will show on histopathology a regenerative erosive vulvitis with loss of epithelial maturation and nuclear changes, which requires clinicopathologic correlation to distinguish from dVIN. Abstract : Erosive lichen planus and differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia may closely resemble each other histologically and require clinicopathological correlation to be distinguished.