Can orthopedic surgeons help create a better head start for osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture?. Issue 27 (July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rinat, Barak; Rubin, Guy; Orbach, Hagay; Giwnewer, Uriel; Rozen, Nimrod
• Editors: Mayr., Johannes
• Is Part Of: Medicine. Volume 95:Issue 27(2016)
• Page Start: e4141
• Publication Date: 2016-07
• Subjects: calcium -- communal treatment -- diagnosis -- discharge recommendation -- osteoporotic fracture -- vitamin D; Medicine -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Médecine -- Périodiques; Geneeskunde; Medicine; Periodicals; Periodicals; 610.5
• DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004141
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7974

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Treatment for osteoporosis in the community in patients who were operated for hip fracture appears to be suboptimal at best. Evidence regarding treatment beyond the 1st year after surgery is scarce. We examined the association between discharge recommendations for treatment of osteoporosis in patients suffering from hip fractures and treatment beyond the 1st year. Methods and materials: We performed a retrospective observational cohort study in patients age 50 to 90 years operated for osteoporotic hip fractures between the years 2008 and 2014. We investigated the correlation between discharge recommendations and rates of osteoporosis treatment postdischarge 1 to 7 years, and the influence of osteoporosis diagnosis upon treatment. Exclusion criteria besides age included high-energy trauma, pathologic or periprosthetic fractures, and patients deceased within 1-year postsurgery. Results: A total of 602 patient files were examined. Univariate analysis showed that, of 283 patients who were prescribed dietary supplementation of vitamin D and calcium, a significantly higher percentage of patients received treatment if they had a recommendation (50.3% vs 36.1%, P = 0.0005), were diagnosed (43.8% vs 14.4%, P < 0.0001), or were of female gender (84.1% vs 57.3%, P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratio (OR) for receiving treatment compared with the control group (patients without a recommendation and a diagnosis) was higher among patients who had both a recommendation and a treatment (OR = 5.4, P < 0.0001) than the group with a diagnosis only (OR = 4.75, P < 0.0001) or a recommendation only (OR = 2.06, P = 0.0006). Conclusions: A formal recommendation for osteoporosis treatment in the discharge letters of patients who suffered hip fragility fractures increases treatment rate of osteoporosis in the community compared with patients without a recommendation. Patients who receive such a recommendation but also have a formal coded diagnosis of osteoporosis in their medical files have an even higher chance of receiving treatment in the community. Our observations may assist in amplifying the overall treatment rates, which are still undoubtedly low.