Causal Analysis of Emergency Department Delays. Issue 3 (July 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kheirbek, Raya E.; Beygi, Shervin; Zargoush, Manaf; Alemi, Farrokh; Smith, Alyshia W.; Fletcher, Ross D.; Seton, Philip N.; Hawkins, Brian A.
• Is Part Of: Quality management in health care. Volume 24:Issue 3(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-07
• Subjects: control charts -- emergency department -- health care quality improvement -- root-cause analysis -- run charts -- statistics; Medical care -- Quality control -- Periodicals; Total quality management -- Periodicals; Health services administration -- Periodicals; 362.1068
• DOI: 10.1097/QMH.0000000000000067
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1063-8628

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Improvement teams make causal inferences, but the methods they use are based on statistical associations. This article shows how data and statistical models can be used to help improvement teams make causal inferences and find the root causes of problems. Methods: This article uses attribution data, competing risk survival analysis, and Bayesian network probabilities to analyze excessive emergency department (ED) stays within one hospital. We use data recorded by ED clinicians that attributed the cause of excessive ED stays to 23 causes for the 70 049 ED visits between March 2011 and April 2014. We use competing risk survival analysis to identify contribution of each cause to the delay. We use Bayesian network models to analyze interaction among different causes of excessive stays and find the root causes of this problem. Results: This article shows the utility of causal analysis to help improvement teams focus on the root causes of problems. For the example analyzed in the article, most causes for patients' excessive ED stays were related to the hospital operations outside the ED. Therefore, improvement projects inside the ED such as expanding ED, increasing staff at the ED, or improving operations are less likely to have a positive impact on reducing excessive ED stays. On the contrary, interventions that improve hospital occupancy (better discharge, expansion of beds, etc) or improve laboratory response times are more likely to result in positive outcomes.