Predictors Of Treatment Failure After Radiofrequency Ablation For Intramucosal Adenocarcinoma in Barrett Esophagus: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Cohort Study. (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Agoston, Agoston T.; Strauss, Adam C.; Dulai, Parambir S.; Hagen, Catherine E.; Muzikansky, Alona; Fudman, David I.; Abrams, Julian A.; Forcione, David G.; Jajoo, Kunal; Saltzman, John R.; Odze, Robert D.; Lauwers, Gregory Y.; Gordon, Stuart R.; Lightdale, Charles J.; Rothstein, Richard I.; Srivastava, Amitabh
• Is Part Of: American journal of surgical pathology. Volume 40:Number 4(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: radiofrequency ablation -- endoscopic mucosal resection -- intramucosal adenocarcinoma -- Barrett esophagus; Pathology, Surgical -- Periodicals; 617.0705
• DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000566
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0147-5185

Abstract

Abstract : Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), with or without endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), is a safe, effective, and durable treatment option for Barrett esophagus (BE)–associated dysplasia (DYS), but few studies have identified predictors of treatment failure in BE-associated intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC). The aim of this study was to determine the rate of IMC eradication when using RFA±EMR and to identify clinical and pathologic predictors of treatment failure. A retrospective review of medical records and a central review of index histologic parameters were performed for 78 patients who underwent RFA±EMR as the primary treatment for biopsy-proven IMC at 4 academic tertiary medical centers. Complete eradication (CE) (absence of IMC/DYS on first follow-up endoscopy) was achieved in 86% of patients, and durable eradication (DE) (CE with no recurrence of IMC/DYS until last follow-up) was achieved in 78% of patients, with significant variation between the 4 study sites ( P =0.03 and 0.09 by analysis of variance for DE and CE, respectively). Use of EMR before RFA significantly reduced the risk for treatment failure for IMC/DYS (hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.48; P =0.001), whereas IMC involving ≥50% of the columnar metaplastic area on index examination significantly increased the risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio, 4.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-11.7; P =0.005). Endoscopic and pathologic factors associated with treatment failure in BE-associated IMC treated with RFA±EMR may help identify the subset of IMC patients for whom a more aggressive initial approach may be justified.