Heidegger's Philosophy of Art. Issue 1 (10th February 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cashell, Kieran
• Is Part Of: Journal of critical realism. Volume 13:Issue 1(2014)
• Page Start: 84
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2014-02-10
• Subjects: A Pair of Shoes -- aesthetics -- aesthetic alienation -- aletheia -- enframing -- Heidegger -- modernity -- ontotheology -- postmodernity -- representation -- subject-object dualism -- the nothing -- truth -- van Gogh; Critical realism -- Periodicals; Réalisme critique; 149.205
• DOI: 10.1179/1476743013Z.00000000016
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1476-7430

Abstract

Abstract : This essay builds on a review of Iain Thomson's recent monograph, Heidegger, Art, and Postmodernity, the theme of which is Heidegger's post- Kehre thinking. Through a series of close textual exegeses, and attentive analyses of concepts, Thomson traces the philosopher's concern to envisage a means of escaping the late-modern comprehension of being. The latter is characterized, in Thomson's interpretation, by the 'technological' or Nietzschesque understanding of ontology in terms of the eternally recurring will-to-power, according to which objects are identified as intrinsically meaningless, optimifically available, utilitarian resources. Thomson argues that Heidegger's engagement with modern painting seeks to develop an alternative paradigm, characterized as a concrete, phenomenological attempt to show how modernity can be transcended from within through reflection on art. Thomson amplifies Heidegger's conviction that modernity implicitly influences the conceptual substrate of modern aesthetics into a critique of the motivating framework that continues to normatively determine the continuing grounding assumptions of the philosophy of art. I show that Thomson's book, by revisiting Heidegger in this form, importantly intimates a way of transcending the philosophical disenfranchisement of art, by releasing art from its alethic alienation and reversing the inured philosophical narrative that still defines the relationship between representation and truth and, in the process, leads to a potentially radical reevaluation of aesthetic value.