Differential antagonism and tolerance/cross-tolerance among nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonists: scheduled-controlled responding and hypothermia in C57BL/6J mice. Issue 2 (April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Moura, Fernando B.; McMahon, Lance R.
• Is Part Of: Behavioural pharmacology. Volume 27:Issue 2/3(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-04
• Subjects: cross-tolerance -- cytisine -- dihydro-β-erythroidine -- epibatidine -- hypothermia -- mecamylamine -- nicotine -- simple-schedule responding -- tolerance -- varenicline; Psychopharmacology -- Periodicals; Nervous System -- drug effects -- Periodicals; Behavior -- drug effects -- Periodicals; 615.78
• DOI: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000233
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0955-8810

Abstract

Abstract : The tobacco-dependence pharmacotherapies varenicline and cytisine act as partial α4β2 nAChR agonists. However, the extent to which α4β2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) mediate their in-vivo effects remains unclear. Nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, and epibatidine were studied in male C57BL/6J mice for their effects on rates of fixed ratio responding and rectal temperature alone and in combination with the nonselective nAChR antagonist mecamylamine and the α4β2 nAChR antagonist dihydro-β-erythroidine. The effects of nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, epibatidine, and cocaine were assessed before and during chronic nicotine treatment. The rate-decreasing and hypothermic effects of nicotine, varenicline, cytisine, and epibatidine were antagonized by mecamylamine (1 mg/kg), but only the effects of nicotine and epibatidine were antagonized by dihydro-β-erythroidine (3.2 mg/kg). Chronic nicotine produced 4.7 and 5.1-fold rightward shifts in the nicotine dose–effect functions to decrease response rate and rectal temperature, respectively. Nicotine treatment decreased the potency of epibatidine to decrease response rate and rectal temperature 2.2 and 2.9-fold, respectively, and shifted the varenicline dose–effect functions 2.0 and 1.7-fold rightward, respectively. Cross-tolerance did not develop from nicotine to cytisine. These results suggest that the in-vivo pharmacology of tobacco cessation aids cannot be attributed to a single nAChR subtype; instead, multiple receptor subtypes differentially mediate their effects.