Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Issue 11 (November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Issue 11 (November 2016)
- Main Title:
- Incidence and severity of chronic pain after caesarean section
- Authors:
- Weibel, Stephanie
Neubert, Katharina
Jelting, Yvonne
Meissner, Winfried
Wöckel, Achim
Roewer, Norbert
Kranke, Peter - Abstract:
- Abstract : BACKGROUND: The frequency of caesarean section has increased dramatically in recent decades. Despite this, robust data regarding the consequences of caesarean section in terms of developing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analysed the incidence and severity of CPSP in women 3 to less than 6, 6 to less than 12, and at least 12 months after caesarean section. DESIGN: Systematic review of prospective and retrospective observational studies and randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE to May 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies investigating the incidence and/or severity of CPSP at least 3 months after caesarean section. The primary outcome was chronic postsurgical wound pain (CPSP 'wound'). Secondary outcomes were persistent pain in the back area, pelvic region or reported as residual pain, and severity of 'birth-related' chronic pain. RESULTS: Meta-analysis using the random-effects model based on 15 studies ( n = 4475) reporting CPSP 'wound' at 3 to less than 6 months after caesarean section revealed an incidence of 15.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 to 20.9%]. For 6 to less than 12 and at least 12 months after caesarean section, the incidence of CPSP 'wound' was estimated at 11.5% (95% CI: 8.1 to 15.0%, n = 3345) and 11.2% (95% CI: 7.4 to 15.0%, n = 3451), respectively. Meta-regression analysis using the publication year as predictor revealedAbstract : BACKGROUND: The frequency of caesarean section has increased dramatically in recent decades. Despite this, robust data regarding the consequences of caesarean section in terms of developing chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) are still lacking. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review analysed the incidence and severity of CPSP in women 3 to less than 6, 6 to less than 12, and at least 12 months after caesarean section. DESIGN: Systematic review of prospective and retrospective observational studies and randomised controlled trials with meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: We searched MEDLINE to May 2015. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: We included all studies investigating the incidence and/or severity of CPSP at least 3 months after caesarean section. The primary outcome was chronic postsurgical wound pain (CPSP 'wound'). Secondary outcomes were persistent pain in the back area, pelvic region or reported as residual pain, and severity of 'birth-related' chronic pain. RESULTS: Meta-analysis using the random-effects model based on 15 studies ( n = 4475) reporting CPSP 'wound' at 3 to less than 6 months after caesarean section revealed an incidence of 15.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 9.9 to 20.9%]. For 6 to less than 12 and at least 12 months after caesarean section, the incidence of CPSP 'wound' was estimated at 11.5% (95% CI: 8.1 to 15.0%, n = 3345) and 11.2% (95% CI: 7.4 to 15.0%, n = 3451), respectively. Meta-regression analysis using the publication year as predictor revealed stable CPSP 'wound' incidences at each postoperative time slot from 2002 to the present. Of those patients who reported chronic pain, 9.6% (95% CI: 0.0 to 21.0%) had severe pain, 23.5% (95% CI: 10.0 to 37.0%) had moderate pain and 49.2% (95% CI: 18.9 to 79.4%) had mild pain at 6 months. LIMITATIONS: Major limitations are high statistical heterogeneity of the meta-analyses and inconsistencies in reporting severity of chronic 'birth-related' pain. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis finds a clinically relevant incidence of CPSP 'wound' after caesarean section ranging from 15% at 3 months to 11% at 12 months or longer that has been largely stable in recent years. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- European journal of anaesthesiology. Volume 33:Issue 11(2016:Nov.)
- Journal:
- European journal of anaesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Issue 11(2016:Nov.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 11 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 11
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0033-0011-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11
- Subjects:
- Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthesiology -- Periodicals
Anesthésiologie -- Périodiques
Anesthesiology
Periodicals
Electronic journals
617.96 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ejanaesthesiology/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2346/issues ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=eja ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00003643-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/0265-0215 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000535 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0265-0215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3829.722200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4957.xml