Effect of Beta Blockers and Renin–Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Issue 10 (March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Effect of Beta Blockers and Renin–Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Issue 10 (March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Effect of Beta Blockers and Renin–Angiotensin System Inhibitors on Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
- Authors:
- Lee, Pil Hyung
Park, Gyung-Min
Kim, Young-Hak
Yun, Sung-Cheol
Chang, Mineok
Roh, Jae-Hyung
Yoon, Sung-Han
Ahn, Jung-Min
Park, Duk-Woo
Kang, Soo-Jin
Lee, Seung-Whan
Lee, Cheol Whan
Park, Seong-Wook
Park, Seung-Jung - Editors:
- Roever., Leonardo
- Abstract:
- Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract : Abstract: Because it remains uncertain whether β-blockers (BBs) and/or renin–angiotensin system inhibitors benefit a broad population of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs in improving survival for post-AMI patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). From the nationwide data of the South Korea National Health Insurance, 33, 390 patients with a diagnosis of AMI who underwent a PCI between 2009 and 2013 and survived at least 30 days were included in this study. We evaluated the risk of all-cause death for patients treated with both BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) (n = 16, 280), only BB (n = 3683), and only ACEI/ARB (n = 9849), with the drug-untreated patients (n = 3578) as the reference. Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, although treated patients displayed a trend toward improved survival, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of all-cause death when patients were treated with both drugs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.06, P = 0.154), BB (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68–1.14, P = 0.325), or ACEI/ARB (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68–1.04, P = 0.111). No additional benefit was found for the combination therapy compared with either isolated BB (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80–1.21, P = 0.856) or ACEI/ARB (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89–1.19, PAbstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Abstract : Abstract: Because it remains uncertain whether β-blockers (BBs) and/or renin–angiotensin system inhibitors benefit a broad population of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients, we sought to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs in improving survival for post-AMI patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). From the nationwide data of the South Korea National Health Insurance, 33, 390 patients with a diagnosis of AMI who underwent a PCI between 2009 and 2013 and survived at least 30 days were included in this study. We evaluated the risk of all-cause death for patients treated with both BB and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI)/angiotensin II receptor antagonist (ARB) (n = 16, 280), only BB (n = 3683), and only ACEI/ARB (n = 9849), with the drug-untreated patients (n = 3578) as the reference. Over a median follow-up of 2.4 years, although treated patients displayed a trend toward improved survival, there were no significant differences in the adjusted risk of all-cause death when patients were treated with both drugs (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–1.06, P = 0.154), BB (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.68–1.14, P = 0.325), or ACEI/ARB (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.68–1.04, P = 0.111). No additional benefit was found for the combination therapy compared with either isolated BB (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.80–1.21, P = 0.856) or ACEI/ARB (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.89–1.19, P = 0.727) therapy. Treatment with BB and/or ACEI/ARB has limited effect on survival in unselected nonfatal AMI patients who undergo PCI. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Medicine. Volume 95:Issue 10(2016)
- Journal:
- Medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 95:Issue 10(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 95, Issue 10 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 10
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0095-0010-0000
- Page Start:
- e2971
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03
- Subjects:
- Medicine -- Periodicals
Medicine -- Periodicals
Médecine -- Périodiques
Geneeskunde
Medicine
Periodicals
Periodicals
610.5 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/md-journal/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&MODE=ovid&NEWS=N&AN=00002060-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000002971 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0025-7974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5534.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4976.xml