Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Treatment of Hepatolithiasis Within the Left Lobes: A Randomized Trial Study. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Treatment of Hepatolithiasis Within the Left Lobes: A Randomized Trial Study. Issue 5 (October 2015)
- Main Title:
- Pure Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection in Treatment of Hepatolithiasis Within the Left Lobes
- Authors:
- Ding, Guoqian
Cai, Wang
Qin, Mingfang - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: The application of laparoscopic technology to liver surgery has been developing rapidly, yet very few studies have been conducted to compare the outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resections. So little is known about their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection in treatment of hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes. Patients and Methods: Between January 2010 and May 2013, 98 patients with hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes diagnosed by preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were randomized into open group and laparoscopic group. Each group had 49 patients. We compared the operation time, the amount of bleeding, the length of their stay in hospital, and complications. Results: Of the laparoscopic group, 2 patients were converted to open surgery. No fatal complication occurred in either the open group or the laparoscopic group. There was no statistically significant difference in the complications between the 2 groups (4.08% vs. 6.12%, P =0.64), but the operating time, the amount of bleeding, and the length of stay in hospital were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group ( P <0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic liver resection displays similar safety and feasibility for hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes, and they were also similar withAbstract : Objective: The application of laparoscopic technology to liver surgery has been developing rapidly, yet very few studies have been conducted to compare the outcomes between open and laparoscopic liver resections. So little is known about their advantages and disadvantages. The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection in treatment of hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes. Patients and Methods: Between January 2010 and May 2013, 98 patients with hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes diagnosed by preoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography were randomized into open group and laparoscopic group. Each group had 49 patients. We compared the operation time, the amount of bleeding, the length of their stay in hospital, and complications. Results: Of the laparoscopic group, 2 patients were converted to open surgery. No fatal complication occurred in either the open group or the laparoscopic group. There was no statistically significant difference in the complications between the 2 groups (4.08% vs. 6.12%, P =0.64), but the operating time, the amount of bleeding, and the length of stay in hospital were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group than in the open group ( P <0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscopic liver resection displays similar safety and feasibility for hepatolithiasis within the left lateral lobes, and they were also similar with respect to the overall complications, but the laparoscopic group has an advantage in the operating time, the amount of bleeding, and the length of their staying in hospital. It is, however, agreed between the authors of this paper that further studies with larger number of patients and longer follow-up observations are necessary to make a definitive conclusion. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques. Volume 25:Issue 5(2015)
- Journal:
- Surgical laparoscopy endoscopy & percutaneous techniques
- Issue:
- Volume 25:Issue 5(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 25, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 25
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0025-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-10
- Subjects:
- laparoscopic -- liver resection -- hepatolithiasis -- open group -- laparoscopic group
Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Laparoscopic surgery -- Periodicals
Endoscopy -- Periodicals
Laparoscopy -- Periodicals
617.550597 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00019509-000000000-00000 ↗
http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00129689-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.surgical-laparoscopy.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com/surgical-laparoscopy/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/1530-4515 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000120 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-4515
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8548.234200
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4946.xml