Eliminating Health Care Disparities With Mandatory Clinical Decision Support: The Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Example. Issue 1 (January 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lau, Brandyn D.; Haider, Adil H.; Streiff, Michael B.; Lehmann, Christoph U.; Kraus, Peggy S.; Hobson, Deborah B.; Kraenzlin, Franca S.; Zeidan, Amer M.; Pronovost, Peter J.; Haut, Elliott R.
• Is Part Of: Medical care. Volume 53:Issue 1(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-01
• Subjects: clinical decision support -- venous thromboembolism -- disparities; Economics, Medical -- Periodicals; Insurance, Health -- Periodicals; Santé, Services de -- Administration -- Périodiques; Soins médicaux -- Périodiques; Medical economics -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- Periodicals; Medical economics -- United States -- Periodicals; Health insurance -- United States -- Periodicals; Comprehensive Health Care -- Periodicals; Personal Health Services -- Periodicals; Gezondheidszorg; Économie de la santé -- Périodiques; Santé, Services de -- Périodiques; Health insurance; Medical economics; United States; Periodicals; 362.10973
• DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000251
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0025-7079

Abstract

Abstract : Background: All hospitalized patients should be assessed for venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk factors and prescribed appropriate prophylaxis. To improve best-practice VTE prophylaxis prescription for all hospitalized patients, we implemented a mandatory computerized clinical decision support (CCDS) tool. The tool requires completion of checklists to evaluate VTE risk factors and contraindications to pharmacological prophylaxis, and then recommends the risk-appropriate VTE prophylaxis regimen. Objectives: The objective of the study was to examine the effect of a quality improvement intervention on race-based and sex-based health care disparities across 2 distinct clinical services. Research Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of a quality improvement intervention. Subjects: The study included 1942 hospitalized medical patients and 1599 hospitalized adult trauma patients. Measures: In this study, the proportion of patients prescribed risk-appropriate, best-practice VTE prophylaxis was evaluated. Results: Racial disparities existed in prescription of best-practice VTE prophylaxis in the preimplementation period between black and white patients on both the trauma (70.1% vs. 56.6%, P =0.025) and medicine (69.5% vs. 61.7%, P =0.015) services. After implementation of the CCDS tool, compliance improved for all patients, and disparities in best-practice prophylaxis prescription between black and white patients were eliminated on both services: trauma (84.5% vs. 85.5%, P =0.99) and medicine (91.8% vs. 88.0%, P =0.082). Similar findings were noted for sex disparities in the trauma cohort. Conclusions: Despite the fact that risk-appropriate prophylaxis should be prescribed equally to all hospitalized patients regardless of race and sex, practice varied widely before our quality improvement intervention. Our CCDS tool eliminated racial disparities in VTE prophylaxis prescription across 2 distinct clinical services. Health information technology approaches to care standardization are effective to eliminate health care disparities.