Research Ethics Consultation: Ethical and Professional Practice Challenges and Recommendations. (May 2015)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Research Ethics Consultation: Ethical and Professional Practice Challenges and Recommendations. (May 2015)
- Main Title:
- Research Ethics Consultation
- Authors:
- Sharp, Richard R.
Taylor, Holly A.
Brinich, Margaret A.
Boyle, Mary M.
Cho, Mildred
Coors, Marilyn
Danis, Marion
Havard, Molly
Magnus, David
Wilfond, Benjamin - Abstract:
- Abstract : The complexity of biomedical research has increased considerably in the last decade, as has the pace of translational research. This complexity has generated a number of novel ethical issues for clinical investigators, institutional review boards (IRBs), and other oversight committees. In response, many academic medical centers have created formal research ethics consultation (REC) services to help clinical investigators and IRBs navigate ethical issues in biomedical research. Key functions of a REC service include assisting with research design and implementation, providing a forum for deliberative exploration of ethical issues, and supplementing regulatory oversight. As increasing numbers of academic research institutions establish REC services, there is a pressing need for consensus about the primary aims and policies that should guide these activities. Establishing clear expectations about the aims and policies of REC services is important if REC programs are to achieve their full potential. Drawing on the experiences of a Clinical and Translational Science Award Research Ethics Consultation Working Group, this article describes three major ethical and professional practice challenges associated with the provision of REC: (1) managing multiple institutional roles and responsibilities, (2) managing sensitive information, and (3) communicating with consultation requestors about how these issues are managed. The paper also presents several practical strategiesAbstract : The complexity of biomedical research has increased considerably in the last decade, as has the pace of translational research. This complexity has generated a number of novel ethical issues for clinical investigators, institutional review boards (IRBs), and other oversight committees. In response, many academic medical centers have created formal research ethics consultation (REC) services to help clinical investigators and IRBs navigate ethical issues in biomedical research. Key functions of a REC service include assisting with research design and implementation, providing a forum for deliberative exploration of ethical issues, and supplementing regulatory oversight. As increasing numbers of academic research institutions establish REC services, there is a pressing need for consensus about the primary aims and policies that should guide these activities. Establishing clear expectations about the aims and policies of REC services is important if REC programs are to achieve their full potential. Drawing on the experiences of a Clinical and Translational Science Award Research Ethics Consultation Working Group, this article describes three major ethical and professional practice challenges associated with the provision of REC: (1) managing multiple institutional roles and responsibilities, (2) managing sensitive information, and (3) communicating with consultation requestors about how these issues are managed. The paper also presents several practical strategies for addressing these challenges and enhancing the quality of REC services. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Academic medicine. Volume 90:Number 5(2015)
- Journal:
- Academic medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 90:Number 5(2015)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 90, Issue 5 (2015)
- Year:
- 2015
- Volume:
- 90
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2015-0090-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2015-05
- Subjects:
- Medical education -- Periodicals
Medical policy -- Periodicals
Medical personnel -- Periodicals
Periodicals
610.711 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=00001888-000000000-00000 ↗
http://www.academicmedicine.org ↗
http://www.academicmedicine.org/contents-by-date.0.shtml ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000640 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1040-2446
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0570.513500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4928.xml