Comparison of Pregnancy Stress Between In Vitro Fertilization/Embryo Transfer and Spontaneous Pregnancy in Women During Early Pregnancy. Issue 4 (December 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Shih, Fen-Fen; Chen, Chung-Hey; Chiao, Chia-Yi; Li, Chi-Rong; Kuo, Pi-Chao; Lai, Te-Jen
• Is Part Of: Journal of nursing research. Volume 23:Issue 4(2015)
• Publication Date: 2015-12
• Subjects: in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer -- pregnancy stress -- spontaneous pregnancy; Nursing -- Periodicals; Nursing -- Research -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1097/JNR.0000000000000089
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1682-3141

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Women who undergo in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer (IVF/ET) face complicated psychological stress and negative emotions, which may affect health during pregnancy and the development of the fetus. The current literature does not address the question of whether women who become pregnant spontaneously and women who undergo IVF face similar levels of pregnancy stress. Purpose: This study investigates the differences in pregnancy stress between women with spontaneous pregnancy and women with IVF/ET pregnancy living in central Taiwan during their first 20 weeks of pregnancy. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal design with repeated measures, generalized estimated equations model, Wilks' λ, and Bonferroni test was used. Purposive samples of 163 women who had undergone IVF/ET and of 94 women who had undergone spontaneous pregnancy were enrolled as participants. Pregnancy stress was measured using the Chinese version of the self-administered Pregnancy Stress Scale at the 9th, 12th, and 20th weeks of pregnancy. Results: The psychological stress experienced by IVF participants significantly increased with gestational week during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy ( p < .01) but did not significantly increase in spontaneous-pregnancy participants. Gestational week was the main factor found to influence stress ratings for "identifying maternal role." "Altering body structure and body function" was the main factor found to influence pregnancy stress ( p < .00). The method of becoming pregnant had no significant influence on pregnancy stress during the first 20 weeks of pregnancy ( p > .05). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The results of this study provide clinical evidence that IVF/ET does not cause more stress for women than spontaneous pregnancy. However, the intensity and trend of stresses differed between these two groups. These findings suggest that nurses should consider method of pregnancy when assessing the risk of stress in expectant mothers for each gestational week and when providing appropriate care and support.