The e-Duke Scholarly Collection: Ebook vs. Print Use. Issue 4 (29th August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goodwin, Cathy
• Editors: Cassell, Kay Ann
• Is Part Of: Collection building. Volume 33:Issue 4(2014)
• Publication Date: 2014-08-29
• Subjects: Collection development (Libraries) -- Periodicals; 025.21
• DOI: 10.1108/CB-05-2014-0024
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4953

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: This study compares print and ebook use for identical titles in the e-Duke scholarly collection from 2011 – 2013 to determine format preference for a discrete collection of titles in humanities and social sciences. Design/methodology/approach: Use statistics for the e-Duke Scholarly Collection were downloaded from the ebook platform by title and call number to determine use by title and subject. Circulation statistics were culled from the library's integrated library system for the same titles to compare e-book use to that of the same print title. Findings: Although ebooks had a high number of titles with use as a percent of the collection, examination of substantive use shows a preference for print. While 73% of the ebooks garnered enough interest to click on them, only 12% had substantive use. Research limitations/implications: The e-Duke Scholarly Collection changed platforms in December 2013. The new platform does not require users to create an account to download ebook sections and digital rights management limitations are removed. The same examination of collection use in 2.5 years on the new platform will provide an interesting comparison on the function of platform in ebook use. Originality/value: The comparison of identical print and e-titles is less studied and includes the examination of "substantive use" in comparing print to e-book use.