Who receives cannabis use offers: A general population study of adolescents. (1st November 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Burdzovic Andreas, Jasmina; Pape, Hilde
• Is Part Of: Drug and alcohol dependence. Volume 156(2015)
• Page Start: 150
• Page End: 156
• Publication Date: 2015-11-01
• Subjects: Direct drug use opportunities -- Cannabis offers -- Delinquency -- Risk behaviors -- High-risk peer groups; Drug abuse -- Periodicals; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; 616.86
• DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.09.009
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0376-8716

Abstract

Highlights: Adolescents who received cannabis offers differ from their peers in many respects. Delinquency and peer cannabis use independently predicted being offered cannabis. Peer cannabis use increased the risk of offers primarily for low-delinquent youth. Abstract: Background: Drug use is predicated on a combination of "willingness" and "opportunity". That is, independent of any desire to use drugs, a drug use opportunity is required; be it indirect (i.e., being in a drug-use setting) or direct (i.e., receiving a direct drug offer). However, whether some youth are more likely to encounter such direct drug use opportunities is not fully known. Aims: We examined whether certain characteristics placed adolescents at greater risk for being offered cannabis, after accounting for a number of demographic-, contextual-, interpersonal-, and personal-level risk factors. Methods: We utilized data from a Norwegian school survey ( n = 19, 309) where the likelihood of receiving cannabis offer in the past year was estimated using logistic regression models. Substantive focus was on the individual and combined effects of personal (i.e., delinquency) and interpersonal (i.e., cannabis-using close friend) risk factors. Separate models were fit for middle- and high-school students. Results: Delinquency was a significant risk factor for receiving cannabis offers, as was a cannabis-using best friend. In addition, peer cannabis use increased the risk of cannabis offers mostly for adolescents on the lower delinquency spectrum, but less so for highly delinquent adolescents. These interaction effects were primarily driven by the middle-school cohort. Conclusions: Cannabis offers were more likely to be extended to youth of certain high-risk profiles. Targeted prevention strategies can therefore be extended to a general profile of younger adolescents with externalizing problems and cannabis-using peers.