No clinical benefit of gender-specific total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 6 randomized controlled trials. (August 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cheng, Tao; Zhu, Chen; Wang, Jiaxing; Cheng, Mengqi; Peng, Xiaochun; Wang, Qi; Zhang, Xianlong
• Is Part Of: Acta orthopaedica. Volume 85:Number 4(2014)
• Page Start: 415
• Page End: 421
• Publication Date: 2014-08
• Subjects: Orthopedics -- Periodicals; 616.7005
• DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.931194
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1745-3674

Abstract

Abstract : Background and purpose— There is no consensus regarding the clinical relevance of gender-specific prostheses in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We summarize the current best evidence in a comparison of clinical and radiographic outcomes between gender-specific prostheses and standard unisex prostheses in female patients. Methods— We used the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Science Citation Index, and Scopus databases. We included randomized controlled trials published up to January 2013 that compared gender-specific prostheses with standard unisex prostheses in female patients who underwent primary TKAs. Results— 6 trials involving 423 patients with 846 knee joints met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences were observed between the 2 designs regarding pain, range of motion (ROM), knee scores, satisfaction, preference, complications, and radiographic results. The gender-specific design (Gender Solutions; Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, Indiana) reduced the prevalence of overhang. However, it had less overall coverage of the femoral condyles compared to the unisex group. In fact, the femoral prosthesis in the standard unisex group matched better than that in the gender-specific group. Interpretation— Gender-specific prostheses do not appear to confer any benefit in terms of clinician- and patient-reported outcomes for the female knee.