What To Do About Atheoretic Lags*. Issue 4 (26th August 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cranmer, Skyler J.; Rice, Douglas R.; Siverson, Randolph M.
• Is Part Of: Political science research and methods. Volume 5:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 641
• Page End: 665
• Publication Date: 2015-08-26
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; 320
• DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2015.36
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2049-8470

Abstract

Abstract : We examine a problem that is confronted frequently by political science researchers seeking to model longitudinal data: what to do when one suspects a lag between the realization of a regressor and its effect on the outcome variable, but one has no theoretical reason to suspect a particular lag length. We examine the theoretical challenges posed by atheoretic lags, review existing methods for atheoretic lag analysis—most notably distributed lag specifications—and their shortcomings, and present an alternative approach for atheoretic lag analysis based on Bayesian model averaging (BMA). We demonstrate the use and utility of our approach with two examples: the litigant signal model in American politics and modernization theory in political economy. Our examples show the increasing difficulty of analyzing models with atheoretic lags as the set of possible specifications increases, and demonstrate the effectiveness of BMA for the modal type of specification in time-series cross-sectional applications.