Performance and welfare of rabbit does in various caging systems. (18th June 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mikó, A.; Matics, Zs.; Gerencsér, Zs.; Odermatt, M.; Radnai, I.; Nagy, I.; Szendrő, K.; Szendrő, Zs.
• Is Part Of: Animal. Volume 8:Number 7(2014:Jul.)
• Page Start: 1146
• Page End: 1152
• Publication Date: 2014-06-18
• Subjects: rabbit does, -- cage types, -- reproduction, -- sore hocks, -- preference; Animal breeding -- Periodicals; Animal genetics -- Periodicals; Animal nutrition -- Periodicals; Animal physiology -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; 636.005
• DOI: 10.1017/S1751731114001244
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1751-7311

Abstract

Abstract : The objective of the study was to compare production and welfare of rabbit does and their kits housed in various types of cages. Female rabbits were randomly allocated to four groups with the following cage types: CN: common wire-mesh flat-deck cage, without footrest; CF: cage similar to the CN but with plastic footrest; ECWP: enlarged cage with wire-mesh platform; and ECPP: extra enlarged cage with plastic-mesh platform. All does were inseminated on the same day, 11 days after kindlings. Reproductive performance was evaluated during the first five consecutive kindlings. Severity of sore hocks was scored at each insemination. Location preference of the does and the platform usage of their kits were evaluated. Kindling rate, litter size (total born, born alive, alive at 21 and 35 days) and kit mortality were not significantly influenced by the cage types. The litter weight at 21 days was higher in ECWP and ECPP cages than in the CF group (3516, 3576 and 3291 g, respectively; P <0.001), and at 35 days the difference was only significant between the groups ECPP and CF (8712 and 8060 g, respectively, P <0.05). At 21 and 35 days of age, the kits were heavier in large (ECWP and ECPP) than in conventional cages (CF and CN) ( P <0.001). At the fifth insemination, the percentage of rabbits with sore hocks' score of 1 to 2 (0=intact foot pads; 1=no hairs, callus formed, <2.5 cm; 2=no hairs, callus formed, >2.5 cm) and 3 to 4 (3=callus opened, cracks present; 4=wounds) were 58%, 60%, 78% and 48%, and 0%, 5%, 0% and 48% in groups ECPP, ECWP, CF and CN, respectively. Higher number of daily nest visits was observed for CF does than for ECWP does (12.5 v . 5.9; P <0.05). The frequency of multiple nursing events (>2/day) was higher in the CF group than in the ECWP group (12.1 v. 3.2%; P <0.01). Within large cages, the does were observed on the platform more frequently in the ECPP cages compared with the ECWP cages (56.9% v . 31.7%; P <0.001). Similarly, 2.7% and 0.2% of kits at 21 days of age, and 33.2% and 5.2% of kits at 28 days of age, were found on the platforms of ECPP and ECWP cages, respectively. In conclusion, cages larger than the conventional ones improved kits' weaning weight, plastic footrests and plastic-mesh platforms in conventional and/or large cages reduced sore hocks' problems, plastic-mesh platforms were more used by both does and kits compared with the wire-mesh platforms.