Karst‐driven flexural isostasy in North‐Central Florida. (6th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Woo, Han Byul; Panning, Mark P.; Adams, Peter N.; Dutton, Andrea
• Is Part Of: Geochemistry, geophysics, geosystems. Volume 18:Number 9(2017)
• Page Start: 3327
• Page End: 3339
• Publication Date: 2017-09-06
• Subjects: karstification -- isostatic uplift -- lithospheric flexure -- passive margin -- marine terrace; Geochemistry -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Earth sciences -- Periodicals; 550.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2017GC006934
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1525-2027

Abstract

Abstract: Deformed marine terraces can be used to explore a region's uplift history. Trail Ridge is a marine terrace in north Florida that is nearly 80 m above modern sea level and contains Quaternary marine fossils, a fact that is inconsistent with estimates of paleo‐sea level history since the early Pleistocene. This implies that the terrace has experienced uplift since its formation, as well as nonuniform deformation recorded by the warping of its previously horizontal state. The Florida carbonate platform, located on the passive margin of eastern North America, is a setting where nontectonic influences (e.g. isostatic adjustment, dynamic topography) can be examined. We present a single‐transect, numerical model of vertical displacement, derived from elastic flexure, to assess the influence of karst‐driven isostatic uplift on present day topography of Trail Ridge in north Florida. Flexural modeling predicts elevations in central Florida not observed today, most likely because surface erosion and karst cavity collapse have obliterated this high topography. Older subsurface stratigraphic units, however, display the arched profile predicted from flexural modeling. Mass loss, calculated by differencing modeled topography and observed topography, was found to be 6.75 × 10 12 kg, since emplacement of Trail Ridge. Uplift rates, assuming karst‐driven flexural isostasy alone, using previously estimated ages of Trail Ridge of 0.125, 1.4, 3, or 3.5 Ma were found to be 0.535, 0.048, 0.022, and 0.019 mm/yr, respectively. A more likely explanation of uplift includes contributions from dynamic topography and glacial isostatic adjustment which should be further explored with more advanced geophysical modeling. Key Points: Karstification induced isostatic uplift Flexural response of the lithosphere from uplift Near‐passive margin landscape evolution