Using citizen science in environmental justice: participation and decision-making in a Southern California waste facility siting conflict. Issue 12 (2nd December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dhillon, Carla May
• Is Part Of: Local environment. Volume 22:Issue 12(2017)
• Page Start: 1479
• Page End: 1496
• Publication Date: 2017-12-02
• Subjects: Environmental justice -- citizen science -- public participation -- community capacity -- theories of justice; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; 363.7
• DOI: 10.1080/13549839.2017.1360263
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1354-9839

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Uses of science by environmental justice (EJ) activists reflect struggles to challenge professional scientific expertise, achieve fair outcomes, and effectively participate in decision-making processes. This qualitative research analyses the relationship between citizen science and EJ in a new waste facility siting conflict in urban Los Angeles, namely connections between citizen science and four dimensions of EJ: fair distribution, respect and recognition, participation in decision-making, and community capabilities . Citizen science is one tactic in EJ, yet little research investigates its role in a new facility siting conflict, particularly in relation to multi-faceted EJ goals. The research reveals opportunities for individual empowerment and community capacity building using citizen science, and a small measure of improved respect and recognition for participants who brought their own knowledge, research, and voices to the table. At the same time, the work identifies limitations on citizen science to improve local participatory procedures and decision-making, which also constricted the achievement of outcomes most desired by the EJ group: to prevent approval and construction of the new waste facility. This paper argues that uses of citizen science contributed to partial achievement of EJ goals, while hindered by governance processes that call for public participation yet shield decision-makers from substantive engagement with the volume or content of that participation.