Relevant Anatomy, Morphology, and Implantation Techniques of the Dorsal Root Ganglia at the Lumbar Levels. Issue 7 (12th September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vancamp, Tim; Levy, Robert M.; Peña, Isaac; Pajuelo, Antonio
• Is Part Of: Neuromodulaton. Volume 20:Issue 7(2017)
• Page Start: 690
• Page End: 702
• Publication Date: 2017-09-12
• Subjects: Chronic pain -- cylindrical lead -- delivery sheath -- DRG -- implantation technique; Central nervous system -- Physiology -- Periodicals; Central nervous system -- Diseases -- Periodicals; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ner.12651
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1094-7159

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: While dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation has been available in Europe and Australia for the past five years and in the United States for the past year, there are no published details concerning the optimal procedures for DRG lead implantation. Materials and Methods: We describe several techniques that can be applied to implant cylindrical leads over the DRG, highlighting some tips and tricks according to our experiences. Focus is mainly shifted toward implantations in the lumbar area. We furthermore give some insights in the results we experienced in Spain as well as some worldwide numbers. Implant Techniques and Results: A 14‐gauge needle is placed using a "2‐Level Technique (2‐LT)" or exceptionally a "1‐Level Technique (1‐LT)" or a "Primary‐ or Secondary Technique" at the level of L5. The delivery sheath, loaded with the lead, is advanced toward the targeted neural foramen. The lead is placed over the dorsal aspect of the DRG. A strain relief loop is created in the epidural space. Sheath and needle are retracted and the lead is secured using an anchor or anchorless technique. In Spain, 87.2% ( N = 78) of the selected patients have been successfully implanted. Seven (8.9%) had a negative trial and three (4.2%) were explanted. Average VAS score decreased from 8.8 to 3.3 and on average 94.5% of the pain area was covered. In our center's subjects ( N = 47 patients, 60.3% of all implanted patients in Spain), VAS scores decreased from an average of 8.8–1.7 and pain coverage averaged 96.4%. We used an average of 1.8 electrodes. Worldwide more than 4000 permanent cases have been successfully performed. Conclusions: We present implantation techniques whereby a percutaneous lead is placed over the DRG through the use of a special designed delivery sheath. Further investigation of the safety, efficacy, and sustainability of clinical outcomes using these devices is warranted.