Academic voice: On feminism, presence, and objectivity in writing. Issue 4 (16th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mitchell, Kim M.
• Is Part Of: Nursing inquiry. Volume 24:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-04-16
• Subjects: academic voice -- academic writing -- feminist theory -- nursing -- positivist epistemology; Nursing -- Periodicals; 610.73
• DOI: 10.1111/nin.12200
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1320-7881

Abstract

Abstract : Academic voice is an oft‐discussed, yet variably defined concept, and confusion exists over its meaning, evaluation, and interpretation. This paper will explore perspectives on academic voice and counterarguments to the positivist origins of objectivity in academic writing. While many epistemological and methodological perspectives exist, the feminist literature on voice is explored here as the contrary position. From the feminist perspective, voice is a socially constructed concept that cannot be separated from the experiences, emotions, and identity of the writer and, thus, constitutes a reflection of an author's way of knowing. A case study of how author presence can enhance meaning in text is included. Subjective experience is imperative to a practice involving human interaction. Nursing practice, our intimate involvement in patient's lives, and the nature of our research are not value free. A view is presented that a visible presence of an author in academic writing is relevant to the nursing discipline. The continued valuing of an objective, colorless academic voice has consequences for student writers and the faculty who teach them. Thus, a strategically used multivoiced writing style is warranted.