Disembodied politics: commitment and formal distance in Rancière*. Issue 4 (2nd October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Madore, Joël
• Is Part Of: Journal for cultural research. Volume 21:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 309
• Page End: 322
• Publication Date: 2017-10-02
• Subjects: Rancière -- Kant -- Lévinas -- politics -- aesthetic -- distance -- emancipation -- identity; Ethics -- Periodicals; Values -- Periodicals; Culture -- Periodicals; Intellectual life -- Periodicals; 306
• DOI: 10.1080/14797585.2017.1370484
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1479-7585

Abstract

Abstract: In light of the theme and concerns of the present collection of essays, we may ask whether 'distance in general', and 'critical distance in particular' (Fredric Jameson), has truly disappeared with postmodernity. Proposing an immediate and interruptive political engagement with local issues, Jacques Rancière's articulation of political mobilisation does seem to confirm this claim. Upon further inspection, however, his emancipatory politics repeat the same mistake of valuing an abstract universal at the expense of a concrete particular, however paradoxical this may seem at first sight. The present article develops this thesis in three moments. On the first hand, it highlights Rancière's notion of conflict as being institutive of politics. Secondly, it connects this 'sensible', and Rancière's understanding of politics as being aesthetic, to Kant's 'Transcendental Aesthetics'. The French author sees in the leading section of the first Critique the grounding possibility of (I) freeing up time and space within the social realm; (II) the representation of a common political surface that can be reshaped; (III) political equality; (IV) emancipation. The last section shows how this recourse to the transcendental subject in Rancière's politics follows and embraces a traditional position in the history of philosophy whereby identity is denigrated at the profit of a disembodied universalism.