Ceiling smoke front velocity in a tunnel with central mechanical exhaust system: Comparison of model predictions with measurements. (25th December 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tang, F.; Mei, F.Z.; Li, L.J.; Chen, L.; Ding, J.X.; Wang, Q.; Xu, X.Y.
• Is Part Of: Applied thermal engineering. Volume 127(2017)
• Page Start: 689
• Page End: 695
• Publication Date: 2017-12-25
• Subjects: Tunnel fire -- Ceiling extraction -- Front velocity -- Ceiling smoke -- Heat loss; Heat engineering -- Periodicals; Heating -- Equipment and supplies -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 621.40205
• DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.07.132
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-4311

Abstract

Highlights: Smoke front velocity of ceiling jet was studied in a 66 m long model tunnel. Front velocity of ceiling jet with the effect of ceiling extraction was considered. The previous prediction models were compared with the experimental measurements. Jones' model and Benjamin's model have the maximum deviation of about 60% and 98%. Hinkley's model was proved to be applicable with and without ceiling extraction. Abstract: The front velocity of transient ceiling becomes an important consideration for tunnel fire safety, which provide a prediction of travel time of ceiling jet. The previous model predictions of ceiling jet front velocity were developed in a natural ventilation tunnel. The effect of central mechanical exhaust system on the ceiling jet front velocity have not been revealed in the past. This work experimentally revealed smoke front velocity of ceiling jet in a tunnel under the effect of central mechanical exhaust system, and the relative location between fire source and central exhaust system were considered. It is found that, the relative direction of fire source and ceiling mechanical extraction opening has a great influence on the smoke front velocity of ceiling jet. Some previous models (Jones, Benjamin, and CFAST) all overestimate the smoke flow velocity of ceiling front; the predicted ceiling jet front velocity deduced by Jones and Benjamin have the maximum excessive deviation of about 60% and 98%, respectively, but the CFAST model is closer to the measurements with relatively higher front velocity. The Hinkley's model can be well used to predict it with different central mechanical exhaust system.