'How can the people be restricted?': the Mont Pèlerin Society and the problem of democracy, 1947–1998. Issue 5 (4th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Cornelissen, Lars
• Is Part Of: History of European ideas. Volume 43:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 507
• Page End: 524
• Publication Date: 2017-07-04
• Subjects: Democracy -- neoliberalism -- Mont Pèlerin Society -- F.A. Hayek -- James M. Buchanan -- de-democratization; Europe -- Intellectual life -- Periodicals; Europe -- History -- Periodicals; 190.5
• DOI: 10.1080/01916599.2017.1365745
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-6599

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Drawing upon archival material, this article offers an overview and discussion of the manner in which the topic of representative democracy was addressed during conferences of the Mont Pèlerin Society in the period between 1947 and 1998. I contend that the most common critique of democracy amongst MPS members was that democratic politics has the tendency to lead to interventions in the economy, thus distorting or even destroying the market mechanism. Yet most members were simultaneously convinced that democracy is a necessary condition of individual liberty, which meant that democracy, rather than being either a mere nuisance or an irredeemable obstacle that must be rejected wholesale, posed a genuine problem for them. Whilst at MPS conferences a myriad of solutions to the problem of democracy was explored, one such solution was suggested most often and theorized most thoroughly, namely the imposition of constitutional limits on popular power; a proposal that often amounted to an attempt radically to circumscribe citizens' influence on the legislature. I conclude by reflecting upon the implications of these findings for the scholarly study of neoliberal thought on democracy.