Critical predicted no effect concentrations (PNECs) should not be based on a single toxicity test. (30th March 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chapman, Peter M.; Elphick, James R.
• Is Part Of: Environmental toxicology and chemistry. Volume 34:Number 5(2015:May)
• Page Start: 1088
• Page End: 1090
• Publication Date: 2015-03-30
• Subjects: Hazard/risk assessment -- Ecotoxicology -- Species sensitivity distribution -- PNECs -- Response curves; Pollution -- Environmental aspects -- Periodicals; Environmental chemistry -- Periodicals; 615.902
• DOI: 10.1002/etc.2897
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0730-7268

Abstract

Abstract: Predicted no‐effect concentrations (PNECs), which represent the concentration of a substance below which an unacceptable effect most likely will not occur, are widely used for risk assessment and in environmental policy and regulation. They are typically based on single‐species laboratory toxicity tests; often, a single test result for the most sensitive endpoints drives the derivation of a PNEC. In the present study, the authors provide a case study emphasizing the importance of determining the reliability of those most sensitive endpoints. Five 21‐d Daphnia magna toxicity tests conducted using the same procedures by 2 laboratories gave 20% inhibitory concentration responses to a specific ionic composition of total dissolved solids that varied from 684 mg/L to more than 1510 mg/L. The concentration–response curve was shallow; thus, these differences could have been attributable to chance alone. The authors strongly recommend that the most sensitive endpoints that determine PNECs not be based on a single toxicity test result but rather on the geometric mean of at least 3 test results to adequately assess and bound test variability, especially when the concentration–response curve is shallow. Environ Toxicol Chem 2015;34:1088–1090. © 2015 SETAC