A nonlinear magnetic circuit model for periodic eddy current problems using T, ϕ-ϕ formulation. Issue 3 (2nd May 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Plasser, Rene; Koczka, Gergely; Bíró, Oszkár
• Is Part Of: Compel. Volume 36:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 649
• Page End: 664
• Publication Date: 2017-05-02
• Subjects: Finite element methods -- 3D FEM -- Eddy currents -- Electromagnetics -- Non-linear -- Magnetic circuit model; Electrical engineering -- Data Processing -- Periodicals; Electrical engineering -- Mathematics -- Periodicals; Electrical engineering -- Periodicals; Electronics -- Data Processing -- Periodicals; Electronics -- Mathematics -- Periodicals; 621.3
• DOI: 10.1108/COMPEL-09-2016-0390
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0332-1649

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: A transformer model is used as a benchmark for testing various methods to solve 3D nonlinear periodic eddy current problems. This paper aims to set up a nonlinear magnetic circuit problem to assess the solving procedure of the nonlinear equation system for determining the influence of various special techniques on the convergence of nonlinear iterations and hence the computational time. Design/methodology/approach: Using the T, ϕ-ϕ formulation and the harmonic balance fixed-point approach, two techniques are investigated: the so-called "separate method" and the "combined method" for solving the equation system. When using the finite element method (FEM), the elapsed time for solving a problem is dominated by the conjugate gradient (CG) iteration process. The motivation for treating the equations of the voltage excitations separately from the rest of the equation system is to achieve a better-conditioned matrix system to determine the field quantities and hence a faster convergence of the CG process. Findings: In fact, both methods are suitable for nonlinear computation, and for comparing the final results, the methods are equally good. Applying the combined method, the number of iterations to be executed to achieve a meaningful result is considerably less than using the separated method. Originality/value: To facilitate a quick analysis, a simplified magnetic circuit model of the 3D problem was generated to assess how the different ways of solutions will affect the full 3D solving process. This investigation of a simple magnetic circuit problem to evaluate the benefits of computational methods provides the basis for considering this formulation in a 3D-FEM code for further investigation.