Shades of Grey: Guidelines for Working with the Grey Literature in Systematic Reviews for Management and Organizational Studies. (19th April 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Adams, Richard J.; Smart, Palie; Huff, Anne Sigismund
• Is Part Of: International journal of management reviews. Volume 19:Number 4(2017)
• Page Start: 432
• Page End: 454
• Publication Date: 2016-04-19
• Subjects: Management -- Periodicals; Business -- Periodicals; 658.3
• DOI: 10.1111/ijmr.12102
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1460-8545

Abstract

Abstract: This paper suggests how the 'grey literature', the diverse and heterogeneous body of material that is made public outside, and not subject to, traditional academic peer‐review processes, can be used to increase the relevance and impact of management and organization studies (MOS). The authors clarify the possibilities by reviewing 140 systematic reviews published in academic and practitioner outlets to answer the following three questions: (i) Why is grey literature excluded from/included in systematic reviews in MOS? (ii) What types of grey material have been included in systematic reviews since guidelines for practice were first established in this discipline? (iii) How is the grey literature treated currently to advance management and organization scholarship and knowledge? This investigation updates previous guidelines for more inclusive systematic reviews that respond to criticisms of current review practices and the needs of evidence‐based management.