Global Spatial–Temporal Variability in Terrestrial Productivity and Phenology Regimes between 2000 and 2012. Issue 6 (2nd November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thompson, Shanley D.; Nelson, Trisalyn A.; Coops, Nicholas C.; Wulder, Michael A.; Lantz, Trevor C.
• Is Part Of: Annals of the American Association of Geographers. Volume 107:Issue 6(2017)
• Page Start: 1519
• Page End: 1537
• Publication Date: 2017-11-02
• Subjects: ecosystem function -- fPAR -- MODIS -- monitoring -- regionalization; 生态系统功能 -- fPAR -- MODIS -- 监测 -- 区域化。; función ecosistémica -- fPAR -- MODIS -- monitoreo -- regionalización; Geography -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Geography; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2017.1309964
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2469-4452

Abstract

Abstract : The productivity and phenology of vegetation are spatially and temporally variable ecosystem functions. Monitoring spatial–temporal patterns in these functions can improve our understanding of global change and natural ecosystem variability and inform management actions. Researchers typically focus on temporal changes within or among static regions and omit dynamics of spatial configuration. Our goal was to assess global spatial–temporal variability in productivity and phenology regimes between 2000 and 2012 using a temporally dynamic functional type classification. Fourteen functional types were defined for each year by clustering the annual sum and annual variability (seasonality) of the fraction of photosynthetically active radiation (fPAR)—a biophysical proxy for vegetation greenness or productivity—from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS). The fourteen functional types ranged from tundra (low cumulative fPAR and highly seasonal) to tropical forests (high cumulative fPAR and low seasonality). Variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics and in two spatial pattern metrics was assessed for each functional type. Many pixels changed from one cluster to another then back again, suggesting considerable short-term variability. Temporal variability in the mean of the fPAR metrics was relatively low, with changes instead primarily manifested in spatial pattern. Spatial pattern was most variable within tundra, grasslands, shrublands, and savannas. A dynamic classification demonstrated the variability in spatial patterns of primary productivity and can be used for future monitoring.