Interbasin water transfer for the rehabilitation of a transboundary Mediterranean stream: An economic analysis. (1st November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Akron, Ariel; Ghermandi, Andrea; Dayan, Tamar; Hershkovitz, Yaron
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental management. Volume 202:Part 1(2017)
• Page Start: 276
• Page End: 286
• Publication Date: 2017-11-01
• Subjects: Intermittent stream -- Travel cost method -- Ecosystem services -- Recreation -- Water allocation -- Cost-benefit analysis; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental management -- Periodicals; Environment -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 363.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.043
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0301-4797

Abstract

Abstract: Global demand for freshwater is increasing as human population grows, climate changes and water resources are being overexploited. Consequently, many freshwater ecosystems, particularly in water-stressed regions, are severely degraded. Here we present a unique case of an Interbasin Water Transfer (IWT) project aiming at ecosystem rehabilitation and recreation enhancement of an intermittent transboundary stream (Ayun, Israel). For the past century, water diversion at the Lebanese side had led to flow secession in the Israeli Ayun Nature Reserve during the dry season (May–November). To restore flow continuum, a sum of 0.5 million cubic meters of high quality freshwaters have been allocated annually during the dry months. The aim of this study is to evaluate the IWT project by: (1) examining the correlation between water flow in the Ayun and recreational visitation, and (2) performing a cost-benefit analysis of the IWT scheme, including non-market benefits. A time-series regression (Adj. R 2 = 0.688, n = 125) shows that a 10% increase in water flow corresponds to a 2.1% increase in monthly visitors. An estimated 18.8% of the visitation rate between 2009 and 2015 can be attributed to the water reallocation project. Through a single-site travel cost model, we estimate the visitor's willingness to pay in US$ 37.8 per person per trip. When non-market benefits for recreation are included, the total benefits of the IWT project substantially exceed its costs. Our results suggest that IWT can be applied to restore water flow and enhance ecosystem services also in water-stressed regions. Highlights: We investigate interbasin water transfer (IWT) for freshwater ES restoration. We perform a cost-benefit analysis, including non-market benefits. Water allocation improves hydrological connectivity and contribute to attractiveness. The transfer produces net economic benefits, mostly non-market benefits. IWT may be a useful strategy for stream rehabilitation in water-limited regions.