A systems approach to risk analysis validation for risk management. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lathrop, John; Ezell, Barry
• Is Part Of: Safety science. Volume 99: Part B (2017)
• Page Start: 187
• Page End: 195
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Risk analysis -- Risk analysis validation -- Trust -- Risk management -- Systems approach -- Culture of analysis quality; Industrial accidents -- Periodicals; Accident Prevention -- Periodicals; Safety -- Periodicals; Travail -- Accidents -- Périodiques; 363.11
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.04.006
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0925-7535

Abstract

Highlights: We present a systems approach linking analysis validation, trust & risk management. Logic: validation should test how effectively an analysis supports risk management. A flowchart links all elements from assumptions & data to implemented risk management. That flowchart has 16 key elements, each is the basis for a validation test. That flowchart has 3 domains: Analysts', Users' and Analysis Community Domains. Abstract: This paper presents a logical structure to address the topic of this special issue: Risk Analysis Validation and Trust in Risk Management. We do that by presenting a systems approach that links all four of those concepts. The underlying logic: Validation should test how effectively a risk analysis supports actual, real-world implemented risk management. Our approach is based on a flowchart linking all of the elements from inputs through risk analysis, risk reporting and transparency, then how that reporting-transparency support the risk management decision making process and associated third party and stakeholder reviews (formal or informal), which in turn determine the trust and acceptance necessary for the real-world implementation of risk management actions. We take that flowchart and identify within it sixteen critical elements, then specify a validation test for each of those elements. Validation, then, consists of subjecting the risk analysis to those sixteen tests. Those tests, together, test the risk analysis for how effectively it supports implemented risk management. Another key feature: We divide the flowchart into Analysts' Domain, Users' Domain, and Analysis Community Domain. The Analysts' Domain is where the risk analysts work, then the Users' Domain stands between their work and implementation. The Analysis Community Domain is comprised of the communities of risk analysts and commissioners of risk analyses. Those two communities are where we would, as part of building our systems approach to risk analysis validation, build a "Culture of Analysis Quality, " where the sixteen validation tests would be enforced by both of those communities.