Comparative use of different emission measurement approaches to determine methane emissions from a biogas plant. (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reinelt, Torsten; Delre, Antonio; Westerkamp, Tanja; Holmgren, Magnus A.; Liebetrau, Jan; Scheutz, Charlotte
• Is Part Of: Waste management. Volume 68(2017)
• Page Start: 173
• Page End: 185
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: Biowaste -- Biogas -- Diffuse emissions -- Tracer dispersion -- Remote sensing -- Leak detection; Hazardous wastes -- Periodicals; Refuse and refuse disposal -- Periodicals; 363.728
• DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.05.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0956-053X

Abstract

Highlights: A comparative CH4 emission measurement campaign was carried out at a biogas plant. On-site and ground-based remote sensing measurement approaches were applied. CH4 emissions measured by ground-based remote sensing varied from 5 to 25 kg h −1 . CH4 emissions measured by on-site measurement methods varied from 5 to 17 kg h −1 . Emission variations were caused by differences in measurement method applied. Also changes in the operational state of the plant resulted in emission variations. Abstract: A sustainable anaerobic biowaste treatment has to mitigate methane emissions from the entire biogas production chain, but the exact quantification of these emissions remains a challenge. This study presents a comparative measurement campaign carried out with on-site and ground-based remote sensing measurement approaches conducted by six measuring teams at a Swedish biowaste treatment plant. The measured emissions showed high variations, amongst others caused by different periods of measurement performance in connection with varying operational states of the plant. The overall methane emissions measured by ground-based remote sensing varied from 5 to 25 kg h −1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6–3.0% of upgraded methane produced), depending on operating conditions and the measurement method applied. Overall methane emissions measured by the on-site measuring approaches varied between 5 and 17 kg h −1 (corresponding to a methane loss of 0.6 and 2.1%) from team to team, depending on the number of measured emission points, operational state during the measurements and the measurement method applied. Taking the operational conditions into account, the deviation between different approaches and teams could be explained, in that the two largest methane-emitting sources, contributing about 90% of the entire site's emissions, were found to be the open digestate storage tank and a pressure release valve on the compressor station.