Comparison of two whole-room ultraviolet irradiation systems for enhanced disinfection of contaminated hospital patient rooms. Issue 2 (October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ali, S.; Yui, S.; Muzslay, M.; Wilson, A.P.R.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hospital infection. Volume 97:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 180
• Page End: 184
• Publication Date: 2017-10
• Subjects: Environmental contamination -- Ultraviolet light -- Clostridium difficile -- Klebsiella pneumoniae -- Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Cross infection -- Periodicals; Cross infection -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- prevention & control -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.08.011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6701

Abstract

Summary: Background: Ultraviolet (UV) light decontamination systems are being used increasingly to supplement terminal disinfection of patient rooms. However, efficacy may not be consistent in the presence of soil, especially against Clostridium difficile spores. Aim: To demonstrate in-use efficacy of two whole-room UV decontamination systems against three hospital pathogens with and without soil. Methods: For each system, six patient rooms were decontaminated with UV irradiation (enhanced disinfection) following manual terminal cleaning. Total aerobic colony counts of surface contamination were determined by spot-sampling 15 environmental sites before and after terminal disinfection and after UV irradiation. Efficacy against biological indicator coupons (stainless-steel discs) was performed for each system using test bacteria (10 6 cfu EMRSA-15 variant A, carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae ) or spores (10 5 cfu C. difficile 027), incorporating low soiling [0.03% bovine serum albumin (BSA)], heavy soiling (10% BSA) or synthetic faeces ( C. difficile only) placed at five locations in the room. Findings: UV disinfection eliminated contamination after terminal cleaning in 8/14 (57%) and 11/14 (79%) sites. Both systems demonstrated 4–5 log10 reductions in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and K. pneumoniae at low soiling. Lower and more variable log10 reductions were achieved when heavy soiling was present. Between 0.1 and 4.8 log10 reductions in C. difficile spores were achieved with low but not heavy soil challenge. Conclusion: Terminal disinfection should be performed on all surfaces prior to UV decontamination. In-house validation studies should be considered to ensure optimal positioning in each room layout and sufficient cycle duration to eliminate target pathogens.