Operative versus non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. (September 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hajibandeh, Shahab; Hajibandeh, Shahin; Panda, Nilanjan; Khan, Rao Muhammad Asaf; Bandyopadhyay, Samik Kumar; Dalmia, Sanjay; Malik, Sohail; Huq, Zahirul; Mansour, Moustafa
• Is Part Of: International journal of surgery. Volume 45(2017)
• Page Start: 58
• Page End: 66
• Publication Date: 2017-09
• Subjects: Small bowel obstruction -- Surgery -- Conservative -- Adhesion -- Adhesiolysis; Surgery -- Periodicals; Surgical Procedures, Operative -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.07.073
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1743-9191

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To investigate outcomes of operative and non-operative management of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO). Methods: We performed a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement standards. We conducted a search of electronic information sources to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating outcomes of operative versus non-operative management of patients with adhesive SBO. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale to assess the risk of bias of RCTs and observational studies, respectively. Fixed-effect or random-effects models were applied to calculate pooled outcome data. Results: We found one RCT, two prospective and three retrospective observational studies, enrolling a total of 876 patients. The analyses showed that operative management of adhesive SBO was associated with a lower risk of future recurrence [odds ratio (OR) 0.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.38–0.76, P = 0.0005] but a higher risk of mortality [risk difference (RD) 0.03, 95% CI 0.01–0.06, P = 0.01] and complications (OR 5.39, 95% CI 2.97–9.78, P < 0.00001). There was no difference in need for surgical re-intervention rate (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.35–1.47, P = 0.36) and length of stay [mean difference (MD) 5.07, 95% CI -2.36–12.49, P = 1.0] between operative and non-operative managements. The baseline suspicion of strangulation was a major confounding factor. When the baseline suspicion of strangulation was higher in the operative group, the risk of mortality (RD 0.04, 95% CI 0.02–0.07, P = 0.0006) and complications (OR 8.14, 95% CI 4.16–15.94, P = 0.00001) were higher in the operative group but the risk of recurrence was lower (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43–0.90, P = 0.01). When the baseline suspicion of strangulation was low in both groups, there was no difference in any of the outcomes except recurrence (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.02–0.37, P = 0.0009) which was lower in the operative group. Conclusions: The difference in baseline suspicion of strangulation between operative and non-operative groups is a major confounding factor in current literature. The benefit of surgical treatment should be balanced with the risks associated with surgery, patient's co-morbidities, and presence or absence of strangulation. Based on the best available evidence it could be argued that surgical intervention could be preserved for cases with high suspicion or evidence of bowel strangulation. The controversy still remains for optimum length of conservative management and timing of surgery (early or late) for cases with low baseline suspicion of strangulation. Randomised controlled trials are required to compare outcomes of early operation (<24 h) versus late operation (>24 h) and early operation versus conservative management in patients with low suspicion of strangulation. Highlights: Operative management of adhesive SBO is associated with risk of morbidity and mortality. Operative management may reduce the risk of future recurrence. Surgery could be preserved for cases with evidence of bowel strangulation. The baseline suspicion of strangulation is a major confounder in current literature. RCTs are required to compare outcomes in patients with low suspicion of strangulation.