Comparison of numerical analysis on the downhole flow field for multi-orifice hydrothermal jet drilling technology for geothermal wells. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Song, Xianzhi; Lyu, Zehao; Cui, Liu; Li, Gensheng; Ji, Guodong; Pang, Zhaoyu
• Is Part Of: Geothermics. Volume 70(2017:Nov.)
• Page Start: 314
• Page End: 323
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Hydrothermal jet -- Drilling performance -- Flow field -- Numerical simulation; Hydrogeology -- Periodicals; Geothermal resources -- Periodicals; Énergie géothermique -- Périodiques; GEOTHERMAL ENGINEERING; GEOTHERMAL ENERGY; GEOTHERMAL EXPLORATION; Geothermal resources; Hydrogeology; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 621.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.geothermics.2017.07.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0375-6505

Abstract

Highlights: The hydrothermal jet drilling technology with a multi-orifice nozzle and cooling water is proposed. Characteristics of impact flow field are revealed considering the thermo-physical properties of the fluid. Comparison is made to obtain the optimal nozzle structure and influences of key factors are investigated. Abstract: Newly developed hydrothermal jet drilling technology has the potential of being economically advantageous over conventional drilling techniques for drilling deep wells in hard formations. By applying coiled tubing techniques and modulating fluid media in the bottomhole reaction chamber, there can be a high temperature and high velocity jet striking and conducting heat to break the rock. So far, there has been no specific study on the influence of nozzle structure on the flow field of multiple hydrothermal jets. This paper presents hydrothermal jet models with different numbers of orifices to investigate the features of flow field, carrying capacity, drilling ability and cooling effect. Results show that for two models in the absence of cooling water, the bottomhole center temperature and pressure are higher than the two sides under multiple hydrothermal jets conditions. This is similar to the flow pattern for a single jet. Additionally, for the five-orifice nozzle with cooling water injected, the entire high temperature region is cylindrical. Ambient cooling water envelops the inner hot water. By comparing different models, the five-orifice nozzle model without cooling water shows a circular symmetric distribution of the bottomhole temperature. With cooling water injected, the central high temperature region becomes rectangular, while the margin of the well bottom is cooled by the peripheral cooling water. The bottom rock average temperature in five-orifice model is lower than for the four-orifice model due to more drastic thermal and kinetic transfer between the hydrothermal jet and the cooling water. The five-orifice nozzle model is better than the four-orifice nozzle model in terms of bottomhole temperature, bottomhole pressure and carrying capacity. Therefore, the five-orifice nozzle should be adopted for hydrothermal jet drilling. It is also feasible to pump down relatively high temperature cooling water to guarantee the high temperature downhole environment. Meanwhile, the cooling water pressure should be controlled during the drilling process for better cooling efficiency. All results in this paper are relevant to the parameters design for multi-orifice hydrothermal jet drilling technology.