Ethical issues in infertility. (August 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Serour, Gamal I.; Serour, Ahmed G.
• Is Part Of: Best practice & research. Volume 43(2017)
• Page Start: 21
• Page End: 31
• Publication Date: 2017-08
• Subjects: bioethics -- human Rights -- reproductive choice -- infertility -- assisted reproductive technology -- conscientious objection; Gynecology -- Periodicals; Obstetrics -- Periodicals; Genital Diseases, Female; Obstetrics; Gynecology; Obstetrics; Periodicals; 618.05
• DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.02.008
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-6934

Abstract

Abstract : Infertility is a global medico-socio-cultural problem with gender-based suffering particularly in developing countries. Conventional methods of treatment for infertility do not usually raise ethical concerns. However, assisted reproductive technology (ART) has initiated considerable ethical debate, disagreement, and controversy. There are three ethical principles that provide an ethical basis for ART: the principle of liberty, principle of utility, and principle of justice. Medical ethics are based on the moral, religious, and philosophical ideas and principles of the society and are influenced by economics, policies, and law. This creates tension between the principles of justice and utility, which can result in disparity in the availability of and access to ART services between the rich and the poor. The moral status of the embryo is the key for all the ethical considerations and law regarding ART in different societies. This has resulted in cross-border ART. Conscientious objection of healthcare providers should not deprive couples from having access to a required ART service.