Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal. (October 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal. (October 2017)
- Main Title:
- Accounting for local impacts of photovoltaic farms: The application of two stated preferences approaches to a case-study in Portugal
- Authors:
- Botelho, Anabela
Lourenço-Gomes, Lina
Pinto, Lígia
Sousa, Sara
Valente, Marieta - Abstract:
- Abstract: Renewable energy sources for electricity generation are unequivocally more environmentally friendly than the traditional sources, but are not impact-free. Given the potential for solar photovoltaic energy to contribute to the energy mix in some countries, it is timely to carefully consider the potential environmental costs of operation of photovoltaic farms, which are experienced by the local population, while the general benefits accrue to all. We apply the contingent valuation method to a sample of local residents close to three selected photovoltaic farms in Portugal. Also, we design a discrete choice experiment to elicit the valuation of specific adverse impacts of electricity generation through photovoltaic energy by national residents. Our results show that the value elicited in the vicinity of the photovoltaic farms is non-negligible. On the other hand, national residents ponder the trade-offs implied by the choice sets and value positively the different adverse local impacts. Both of these estimates, in conjunction or independently, can be used to fully account for this often neglected cost of solar energy. Furthermore, we argue that when studying the public acceptance of renewables, using stated preference methods explicitly presents the trade-offs between negative impacts and costs, contributing to more realistic portrayal of public opinion. Highlights: Solar photovoltaic energy is environmentally friendly but not impact-free. We apply two statedAbstract: Renewable energy sources for electricity generation are unequivocally more environmentally friendly than the traditional sources, but are not impact-free. Given the potential for solar photovoltaic energy to contribute to the energy mix in some countries, it is timely to carefully consider the potential environmental costs of operation of photovoltaic farms, which are experienced by the local population, while the general benefits accrue to all. We apply the contingent valuation method to a sample of local residents close to three selected photovoltaic farms in Portugal. Also, we design a discrete choice experiment to elicit the valuation of specific adverse impacts of electricity generation through photovoltaic energy by national residents. Our results show that the value elicited in the vicinity of the photovoltaic farms is non-negligible. On the other hand, national residents ponder the trade-offs implied by the choice sets and value positively the different adverse local impacts. Both of these estimates, in conjunction or independently, can be used to fully account for this often neglected cost of solar energy. Furthermore, we argue that when studying the public acceptance of renewables, using stated preference methods explicitly presents the trade-offs between negative impacts and costs, contributing to more realistic portrayal of public opinion. Highlights: Solar photovoltaic energy is environmentally friendly but not impact-free. We apply two stated preference economic valuation methods to value those impacts. Contingent valuation method elicits local residents' willingness-to-accept. Discrete choice experiment elicits national residents' willingness-to-pay. These values are non-negligible and should not be neglected in policy decisions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Energy policy. Volume 109(2017)
- Journal:
- Energy policy
- Issue:
- Volume 109(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 109, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 109
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0109-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 191
- Page End:
- 198
- Publication Date:
- 2017-10
- Subjects:
- Photovoltaic farms -- Stated preference methods -- Contingent valuation -- Discrete choice experiments -- Environmental impacts
Energy policy -- Periodicals
Politique énergétique -- Périodiques
Electronic journals
333.79 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/03014215 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.065 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0301-4215
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3747.720000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 4634.xml