Assistive technology interventions for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities: An evidence-based systematic review and meta-analysis. (November 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Perelmutter, Bogi; McGregor, Karla K.; Gordon, Katherine R.
• Is Part Of: Computers & education. Volume 114(2017)
• Page Start: 139
• Page End: 163
• Publication Date: 2017-11
• Subjects: Assistive technology -- Learning disabilities -- Systematic review -- Meta-analysis -- Qualitative review; Education -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Education -- Periodicals; Computers -- Periodicals; Computer-Assisted Instruction -- Periodicals; Éducation -- Informatique -- Périodiques; Electronic journals; 370.285
• DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.06.005
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-1315

Abstract

Abstract: Background: An increasing amount of assistive technology interventions exist for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities, but there has been no systematic review of their effectiveness. Purpose: Are assistive technology interventions effective in learning disabilities for participants ages 14 and up? How do these interventions affect the lived experience of users? We performed a systematic review of both qualitative and quantitative studies to answer these questions. Methods: Using 5 search methods, we located 38 quantitative group-design and single-subject intervention studies, 5 survey studies and 13 qualitative studies. We sorted the group-design and single-subject studies into groups by intervention type and performed meta-analyses. We provided a narrative summary of survey and qualitative publications. We used a modified version of the Downs-Black checklist to assess study quality, where applicable. Results: While assistive interventions proved overall beneficial, the most commonly used interventions were unexpectedly not the most effective. Interventions based on word processing, multimedia and hypertext proved the most effective, while smart pens and text-to-speech systems presented mixed results. Speech-to-text systems had a small positive effect. Participants had mixed emotions and attitudes about their assistive technology. Conclusions: Assistive technology interventions can be helpful for adolescents and adults with learning disabilities, but interventions need to be carefully compared, and customized to the individual. Highlights: Assistive technology can be useful for adolescents and adults with LD. Word processing, multimedia and hypertext interventions were the most effective. Speech-to-text interventions had a small effect. Smart pens and text-to-speech systems had mixed results. Interactions with baseline ability or age can obscure intervention success.