Brief assessment of delirium subtypes: Psychometric evaluation of the Delirium Motor Subtype Scale (DMSS)–4 in the intensive care setting. Issue 5 (12th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Boettger, Soenke; Nuñez, David Garcia; Meyer, Rafael; Richter, Andre; Schubert, Maria; Meagher, David; Jenewein, Josef
• Is Part Of: Palliative & supportive care. Volume 15:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 535
• Page End: 543
• Publication Date: 2017-01-12
• Subjects: Delirium, -- Motor subtypes, -- Classification, -- Delirium Motor Symptom Scale (DMSS), -- Delirium Rating Scale–Revised-98 (DRS–R-98); Palliative treatment -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 616.029
• DOI: 10.1017/S147895151600105X
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1478-9515

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objective: The management of and prognosis for delirium are affected by its subtype: hypoactive, hyperactive, mixed, and none. The DMSS–4, an abbreviated version of the Delirium Motor Symptom Scale, is a brief instrument for the assessment of delirium subtypes. However, it has not yet been evaluated in an intensive care setting. Method: We performed a prospective/descriptive cohort study in order to determine the internal consistency, reliability, and validity of the relevant items of the DMSS–4 versus the Delirium Rating Scale–Revised-98 (DRS–R-98) and the original DMSS in a surgical intensive care setting. Results: A total of 289 elderly, predominantly male patients were screened for delirium, and 122 were included in our sample. The internal consistency of the DMSS–4 items was excellent (Cronbach's α = 0.92), and between the DMSS–4 and DRS–R-98 the overall concurrent validity was substantial (Cramer's V = 0.67). Within individual motor subtypes, concurrent validity remained at least substantial (Cohen's κ = 0.65–0.81) and sensitivity high (69.8 to 82.2%), in contrast to those of the no-motor subtype, with less validity and sensitivity (κ = 0.28, 22%). Similarly, total concurrent validity between the DMSS–4 and the original DMSS reached perfection (Cramer's V = 0.83), as did agreement between the subtypes (κ = 0.83–0.92), while sensitivity remained high (88.2–100%). Only in those with delirium with no-motor subtype was agreement moderate (κ = 0.56) and sensitivity lower (67%). Specificity was high across all subtypes (91.2–99.1%). The DMSS–4 yielded very sensitive ratings, particularly for hypoactive and hyperactive motor symptoms, and interrater agreement was excellent (Fleiss's κ = 0.83). Significance of Results: We found the DMSS–4 to be a most reliable and valid brief assessment of delirium in characterizing the subtypes of delirium in an intensive care setting, with increased sensitivity to hypoactive and hyperactive motor alterations.