China and the Middle East security governance in the new era. Issue 3 (3rd July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sun, Degang
• Is Part Of: Contemporary Arab affairs. Volume 10:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 354
• Page End: 371
• Publication Date: 2017-07-03
• Subjects: Diplomacy -- global governance -- Middle East security governance -- China's Middle East diplomacy -- mediation diplomacy; Arab countries -- Periodicals; Arab countries -- Politics and government -- Periodicals; 909.0974927
• DOI: 10.1080/17550912.2017.1353791
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1755-0912

Abstract

ABSTRACT: In the 21st century, conflicts in the Middle East can generally be classified into four types, namely: conflicts between outside powers and Middle Eastern countries; between Middle Eastern countries themselves; between different political parties and religious sects within a sovereign country; as well as transnational and cross-border conflicts. The mode of China's participation in Middle Eastern security governance includes political, security and social conflicts. There are three categories of domestic mechanisms in Chinese practice, specifically: the special envoy mechanism by the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs; the procession and peace-keeping mechanisms by the Chinese Ministry of National Defense; and the foreign aid mechanism by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce. The China–Arab States Cooperation Forum, the Forum on China–Africa Cooperation, the United Nations and other international organizations constitute the major international regimes for China's security governance. China's Middle Eastern security governance creates not only 'public goods' for the region but also a means for China to build constructive great power relations with the United States, the European Union and Russia, among others. The styles of Chinese and Western security governance in the Middle East vary with the Chinese side placing most emphasis on improving the well-being of Middle Eastern peoples and placing this as the top priority on the agenda, followed by a 'bottom-up' roadmap, and the seeking of incremental, consultative, inclusive and selective governance in Middle East conflict resolution.