Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey's Democratic Theory. Issue 3 (19th June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: LIVINGSTON, ALEXANDER
• Is Part Of: American political science review. Volume 111:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 522
• Page End: 534
• Publication Date: 2017-06-19
• Subjects: Political science -- Periodicals; Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1017/S0003055417000168
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-0554

Abstract

Abstract : John Dewey's democratic theory is celebrated as a classic statement of the theory of deliberative democracy. This article challenges deliberative appropriations of Dewey's political thought by situating his democratic theory within the contentious history of American labor politics. In his writings on direct action, strikes, and class struggle, Dewey advocated coercive and nondeliberative modes of political action as democratic means for democratic ends. Examining Dewey's writings on democracy, action, and the use of force reveals how a means-oriented pragmatism circumvents the problematic dichotomy of ideal ends and non-ideal means framing contemporary debates about idealism and realism in democratic theory. Pragmatism's account of the interdependence of means and ends in political action, as a process of creative and collaborative experimentation, combines a robust defense of coercive tactics with a consequentialist critique of violence.