Detecting Ebola with limited laboratory access in the Democratic Republic of Congo: evaluation of a clinical passive surveillance reporting system1. Issue 9 (28th July 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ashbaugh, Hayley R.; Kuang, Brandon; Gadoth, Adva; Alfonso, Vivian H.; Mukadi, Patrick; Doshi, Reena H.; Hoff, Nicole A.; Sinai, Cyrus; Mossoko, Mathias; Kebela, Benoit Ilunga; Muyembe, Jean‐Jacques; Wemakoy, Emile Okitolonda; Rimoin, Anne W.
• Is Part Of: Tropical medicine & international health. Volume 22:Issue 9(2017)
• Page Start: 1141
• Page End: 1153
• Publication Date: 2017-07-28
• Subjects: surveillance -- infection -- epidemics -- public health -- international health -- Ebola -- integrated disease surveillance and response; surveillance -- infection -- épidémies -- santé publique -- santé internationale -- Ebola -- surveillance et réponse intégrées des maladies; Vigilancia -- Infección -- Epidemias -- Salud Pública -- Salud Internacional -- Ébola -- Vigilancia y respuesta integradas de las enfermedades; Tropical medicine -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 616.988
• DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12917
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1360-2276

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Ebola virus disease (EVD) can be clinically severe and highly fatal, making surveillance efforts for early disease detection of paramount importance. In areas with limited access to laboratory testing, the Integrated Disease Surveillance and Response (IDSR) strategy in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) may be a vital tool in improving outbreak response. Methods: Using DRC IDSR data from the nation's four EVD outbreak periods from 2007–2014, we assessed trends of Viral Hemorrhagic Fever (VHF) and EVD differential diagnoses reportable through IDSR. With official case counts from active surveillance of EVD outbreaks, we assessed accuracy of reporting through the IDSR passive surveillance system. Results: Although the active and passive surveillance represent distinct sets of data, the two were correlated, suggesting that passive surveillance based only on clinical evaluation may be a useful predictor of true cases prior to laboratory confirmation. There were 438 suspect VHF cases reported through the IDSR system and 416 EVD cases officially recorded across the outbreaks examined. Conclusion: Although collected prior to official active surveillance cases, case reporting through the IDSR during the 2007, 2008 and 2012 outbreaks coincided with official EVD epidemic curves. Additionally, all outbreak areas experienced increases in suspected cases for both malaria and typhoid fever during EVD outbreaks, underscoring the importance of training health care workers in recognising EVD differential diagnoses and the potential for co‐morbidities.