Operationalisation of quality of life for adults with severe disabilities. (27th May 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Gómez, L. E.; Arias, B.; Verdugo, M. Á.; Tassé, M. J.; Brown, I.
• Is Part Of: Journal of intellectual disability research. Volume 59:Part 10(2015:Oct.)
• Page Start: 925
• Page End: 941
• Publication Date: 2015-05-27
• Subjects: behavioural measurement methods -- Delphi -- intellectual disability -- learning disability -- quality of life; Mental retardation -- Research -- Periodicals; 362.2
• DOI: 10.1111/jir.12204
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0964-2633

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The operationalisation of quality of life for people with more severe disabilities has been acknowledged in the published research for more than two decades. This study aims to contribute to our knowledge and understanding of the quality of life of adults with severe disabilities by developing a set of quality of life indicators appropriate to this population using a Delphi method and the eight‐domain conceptual model proposed by Schalock & Verdugo (2002 ). Method: The participating panel in the Delphi method included 12 experts who evaluated each proposed item according to four criteria: suitability, importance, observability and sensitivity. Descriptive analyses were used to select the best items in each of the four rounds of this Delphi study, as well as examining the coefficients of concordance that were calculated for the final pool of items. Results: The four rounds of the Delphi study resulted in a final pool of 118 items (91 that were considered valid in the first round plus 27 items proposed, reformulated or discussed in the following rounds). Importance and sensitivity were the criteria that received the highest and lowest ratings, respectively, but also the ones that had the highest and lowest mean coefficients of concordance. Experts showed the strongest agreement for items related to material well‐being, while the weakest was found for items related to personal development. Conclusions: This study further contributes to our understanding of how to operationalise and measure quality of life in adults with severe disabilities. The item pool generated may prove helpful in the development of instruments for the measurement of quality of life‐related outcomes in this population.