Doctoral profile of the medical radiation sciences: a baseline for Australia and New Zealand. Issue 3 (25th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ekpo, Ernest U.; Snaith, Beverly; Harris, Martine A.; McEntee, Mark F.
• Is Part Of: Journal of medical radiation sciences. Volume 64:Issue 3(2017:Sep.)
• Page Start: 195
• Page End: 202
• Publication Date: 2017-04-25
• Subjects: Doctorate -- nuclear medicine technologist -- PhD -- radiation therapist -- radiographer -- research -- sonographer; Radiology, Medical -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- Australia -- Periodicals; Radiology, Medical -- New Zealand -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Diagnostic imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmrs.231
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2051-3895

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: Research is critical to evidence‐based practice, and the rapid developments in technology provide opportunities to innovate and improve practice. Little is known about the research profile of the medical radiation science (MRS) profession in Australia and New Zealand (NZ). This study provides a baseline of their doctoral activity. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey of MRS professionals in Australia and NZ holding a doctorate or undertaking doctoral studies, was performed using an online tool (Bristol Online Survey ®, Bristol, UK). A chain‐referral sampling technique was adopted for data collection. An email invitation with a link to the survey was generated and distributed through email and social media. The survey contained questions related to participant demographics, doctoral status, qualification route, funding and employment. Results: There were 63 responses to the survey comprising 50.8% diagnostic radiographers (DRs; n = 32), 23.8% radiation therapists (RTs; n = 15), with the remaining 25.4% ( n = 16) equally split between sonographers and nuclear medicine technologists (NMTs). A total of 40 (63.5%) of respondents had completed their doctoral qualification. In NZ, only DRs held a doctoral award constituting 0.3% of DRs and 0.2% of the total registered MRS population. In Australia, there was a greater proportion of doctoral NMTs ( n = 8/1098; 0.7%) than RTs ( n = 15/2394; 0.6%) and DRs ( n = 27/12, 001; 0.2%). Conclusion: Similar to other countries, findings show a very small percentage of doctoral MRS professionals in Australia and NZ. Strategies to engage and support individuals in research, up to and beyond doctoral study, need to be embedded in practice. Abstract : This paper examined doctoral achievement of the medical radiation science (MRS) profession in Australia (AU) and New Zealand (NZ). Findings show very low percentage (0.3%) of doctoral MRS professionals in AU and NZ.