Do apples need an Elmo sticker? Children's classification of unprocessed edibles. Issue 5 (20th October 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Elliott, Charlene; Den Hoed, Rebecca Carruthers
• Is Part Of: Critical public health. Volume 27:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 617
• Page End: 623
• Publication Date: 2017-10-20
• Subjects: Children -- public policy -- food marketing; Public health -- Periodicals; Medicine, Preventive -- Periodicals; Medical care -- Periodicals; 362.10941
• DOI: 10.1080/09581596.2016.1262942
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0958-1596

Abstract

Abstract: Healthy eating campaigns that promote unprocessed foods to children using character licensing and fun appeals hope to offset the aggressive marketing of highly processed, unhealthy foods to children. Such campaigns are equally premised on the assumption that fruits, vegetables, and other whole foods are not desirable enough in the current food environment and must be marketed as child friendly to be appealing. This paper examines how children in Canada classify foods and whether they think of whole, unprocessed foods as 'for them.' Children aged 7–12 ( n = 183) completed a survey asking them to classify various foods (fruit, vegetables, milk, eggs, beef, whole grains) as for 'kids', 'adults' or 'both'. Most children classified these foods as for both adults and kids, suggesting that promotional initiatives to convince children that whole foods are uniquely children's fare may not be necessary. Given the questionable efficacy of marketing whole foods as fun and 'for kids, ' alongside the ethical stakes of commercializing childhood, we recommend that public health initiatives reject attempts to market whole foods as kids' foods. Instead a key opportunity exists to emphasize the message that good food is for everyone – which is the most conducive to a building a healthy food environment and positive food habits across a lifetime.