Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity. (June 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Binter, Christian; Gotschy, Alexander; Sündermann, Simon H.; Frank, Michelle; Tanner, Felix C.; Lüscher, Thomas F.; Manka, Robert; Kozerke, Sebastian
• Is Part Of: Circulation. Volume 10:Number 6(2017)
• Publication Date: 2017-06
• Subjects: 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging -- aortic dilation -- aortic stenosis -- bicuspid aortic valve -- echocardiography -- magnetic resonance imaging -- turbulent kinetic energy; Cardiovascular system -- Imaging -- Periodicals; Heart -- Imaging -- Periodicals; 616.1075405
• DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.116.005486
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1941-9651

Abstract

Abstract : Background—: Turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), assessed by 4-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging, is a measure of energy loss in disturbed flow as it occurs, for instance, in aortic stenosis (AS). This work investigates the additional information provided by quantifying TKE for the assessment of AS severity in comparison to clinical echocardiographic measures. Methods and Results—: Fifty-one patients with AS (67±15 years, 20 female) and 10 healthy age-matched controls (69±5 years, 5 female) were prospectively enrolled to undergo multipoint 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging. Patients were split into 2 groups (severe and mild/moderate AS) according to their echocardiographic mean pressure gradient. TKE values were integrated over the aortic arch to obtain peak TKE. Integrating over systole yielded total TKEsys and by normalizing for stroke volume, normalized TKEsys was obtained. Mean pressure gradient and TKE correlated only weakly ( R 2 =0.26 for peak TKE and R 2 =0.32 for normalized TKEsys ) in the entire study population including control subjects, while no significant correlation was observed in the AS patient group. In the patient population with dilated ascending aorta, both peak TKE and total TKEsys were significantly elevated ( P <0.01), whereas mean pressure gradient was significantly lower ( P <0.05). Patients with bicuspid aortic valves also showed significantly increased TKE metrics ( P <0.01), although no significant difference was found for mean pressure gradient. Conclusions—: Elevated TKE levels imply higher energy losses associated with bicuspid aortic valves and dilated ascending aortic geometries that are not assessable by current echocardiographic measures. These findings indicate that TKE may provide complementary information to echocardiography, helping to distinguish within the heterogeneous population of patients with moderate to severe AS. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.